Review on Samsung Galaxy Watch 42 mm Wi-Fi NFC RU, rose gold/pink beige by Jnis Zels ᠌

I debated whether or not to take this watch for a while. Prior to that, I used a number of "classic watches for a suit + mi band 3" and, after hours, "semi-sports + mi band 3" to fix the problem. Once more, you could occasionally just quit the mi band. However, Samsungs were drawn to payments, phone calls, and music listening when not using a phone. Naturally, I reduced my workload in this instance from two to one. Since the Huawei P10 phone, I was also a little concerned about functionality (albeit it turned out that my concerns were unfounded; absolutely all features performed as expected). And I most certainly didn't want to spend $25,000 on this technological wonder. I was forced to buy them for 17,000 when European CE versions started flooding our market (all functions are available without overpaying for growth). I wore it with a bandage for the first two weeks. The findings demonstrated that an inexpensive bracelet counts more accurately than a watch. It can be a little annoying. Although if we take the final indicator and the major three phases, it is generally evident in samsa, the way of presenting sleep phases in xiami is exhibited much more clearly. After using the watch for a month, I can confidently state that it is an excellent watch despite the minor problems listed in a separate window. A full-featured fitness tracker (pool, jogging, training), convenient quick reading of messages and auto-replies to them, payment even without a phone, and music listening while jogging without a phone! Yes, they must be charged on a monthly basis, just like a phone. However, it is obviously impossible to compare with such disparate screens. Another minor drawback is that the ability to wear other watches was lost with the switch to watches, or you would have to part with the sensor indicator lights. Yet such is fate. I can declare with complete assurance that the watch is worth every penny that was spent on it. I suggest.