Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Stanisaw Frank ᠌ photo
1 Level
313 Review
0 Karma

Review on Canon PowerShot A480 camera, black by Stanisaw Frank ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The item is ok but not fully compliant with the description.

The A540 (and more - see my pics for specifics) is mine, and it requires periodic maintenance. I tried out this gadget in the store (A480). That's why I went online and checked out the feedback. has come to an end. Manufacturers can now afford to provide above-average quality products like this camera because of deceptive advertising practices. The matrix of the camera is 1 x 2.3 x 10 megapixels, which is comparable to 1 x 2.5 x 7 megapixels. While comparing 7-megapixel cameras, I decided to get the S760. Comparable to the A540 plus a modern processor in terms of quality (speed). While shooting during the day, an iso of 100 or less yields images that are suitable for viewing at 1024x900 pixels and printing on a 15-by-21-inch sheet. 10x15 printing and 800x600 playback are suitable for use in challenging lighting circumstances (ISO 200 or less). The use of ISO or other sensitivity values is inappropriate. For the entire price, the standard, the screen is visually bright, and the resolution is not a fountain (115,000 pixels). You want the makers to stop increasing the MP and provide the truly necessary features for a camera of this caliber. The universality of the HDMI port in vehicles is one example (it will come very soon, there is no doubt). USB port, and ideally the ability to recharge the batteries without taking them out. The third option involves swapping out the machine's screen for one without an LED backlight and relying on a software feature that disables the screen whenever the device is powered on. Given that at least some of these solutions will become available over the next two years, we have decided to wait for them. Neither do the brand-new 490 nor the 495. Please keep in mind that picture quality is not necessarily between 4 and 5 on the quality scale. We always settle for 3 megapixels when purchasing cameras with an undesirable ratio of matrix sizes to megapixels. Let it be the most practical three plus. Except for the aforementioned details, this machine is a leading example of the aforementioned trio and is predicted to be in higher demand than a face detector. The journal contains information and advice on making a choice. "(not romantic)" Three, plus a significant enhancement.

Pros
  • 1 Cost 2 Optimal Proportion Input signal to noise ratio. The standard is three shots with an ISO of up to 400. There are four AA batteries in this set.
Cons
  • 1 Outdated user interface 2 There is no horizontal or vertical screen position sensor. 3 It's a grainy picture (the norm for the price)