Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Vanchay Chounmalaith ᠌ photo
1 Level
129 Review
73 Karma

Review on Nikon D5100 Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm VR Lens - High Resolution 16.2MP by Vanchay Chounmalaith ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, a pleasure to use.

The market for entry-level digital single-lens reflex cameras (DSLR) has matured to the point where nearly all entry-level DSLRs from brands like Nikon, Canon, Sony, and Pentax are virtually indistinguishable from one another. There is a low probability that you will notice a significant change in quality, particularly in jpeg. If you are primarily interested in video shooting, then I would suggest canons because they are more minimalistic and more reportage-oriented. Canons also produce the best video. Sony has the most advances, but the newcomers to the mirror sphere have the greatest room for improvement; despite this, they are aggressively working to perfect it. Pentax is a way of thinking that produces an artistic impact; it is really specific. In my opinion, Nikon lacks specificity despite having a high degree of versatility. In general, all of the equipment that fall within the amateur category are ubiquitous, particularly when it comes to shooting in Auto or P. Do not become obsessed with technology. But keep in mind that in the world of DSLRs, lenses are the more important component. While cameras are often updated every two to three years and rendered ethically obsolete in that time, the "eyes" of cameras can remain on the market for anywhere from five to ten years or even longer. Consider each individual's perspective when making decisions. In general, the D5100 is a model that is intended for a beginner who will not restrict himself to occasional shooting and/or use of the device by family members, and who will not consider photography to be a serious pastime. If this is the case, the D3100 is the better option for you to pursue. The product is of exceptional quality and stands out favorably among its contemporaries. The 5100 is an excellent option to go with if you are just starting out with digital single-lens reflex cameras but already know that you want to take your photography seriously. Nothing more than potential, superb quality, and a large number of options are included in this offering. You will definitely profit, but there is no chance that you will lose if you pay the additional 5 t. R. and take the 5100. I advise even beginners to do this. The D7000 is for enthusiasts who have already gone through their first DSLRs and who shoot a lot and for a long time; a strong body is important to them, along with a screwdriver (and they are fully aware of what it is:), and an excellent viewfinder. The D7000 comes at a much higher price point. More buttons, of course, are a necessity. The typical enthusiast won't use it very often, and the price has increased by almost 20 percent in the meanwhile. Don't even bother trying. In addition, the 7000 is no longer in its new condition, whilst the 5100 has just been around for half a year. The Nikon D5100 is, without a doubt, one of the very best and most intriguing cameras available in its price range.

Pros
  • 1) One of the best matrices and processors available to amateurs in the market today. Created in sleepy:) Hence, in conditions when there is a reasonable amount of quiet, the 7000 shots, in which this matrix and processor are both present, and the 5100 shots will be similar. 2) Ergonomics, in my opinion, is at the top of the list, as the team did an excellent job working out the design and layout of the buttons. 3) Value for the money. Even so, despite the fact that Thailand was inundated (flooded Nikon, Sony, Canon factories .). In addition, this state will only be transitory; eventually, NG will become less intense. 4) A robust collection of features that are nonetheless well-organized; despite the fact that this is my first DSLR, I was able to figure it out on my own in less than half an hour without consulting the manual (although it is important to have a strong background in photography; starting from full 0 can be challenging). At this time, in general, there is a trend toward increasing the level of devices used by amateurs, and it is getting higher and higher. Due to the fact that they make up the largest portion of the photographic industry, advancements are first put to the test by this group. 5) The rotary screen and the quality of its output. despite the fact that this has become the standard. That in no way changes the reality of the situation ;) 6) The dependability of the instrument in its whole. Not only does Nikon respect himself, but he also respects the people who use his products. It is experienced. All of the devices in the amateur band offer sufficient reliability for the questions being asked. 7) Kitovsky lens. There are certain brands that do not provide them with the appropriate quality. Nikon does it. To begin, the optics are excellent and fully functional.
Cons
  • 1) It is difficult to classify the lack of a screwdriver and additional buttons (the 5100 only has one) as a drawback for this market niche. These have not yet been implemented on devices for amateurs. With "AF" lenses manufactured after the 1980s, which were designed without a motor built in, you will need a screwdriver to change the aperture. Throughout the course of the past five years, relatively few of them have been made, making them an exact replica of the "AF-S" standard. Moreover, a screwdriver makes a lot of noise and moves pretty slowly:) Such lenses are not typically utilized, with a few notable exceptions, particularly by amateur photographers. When there is a fire at the workplace and the conditions are particularly severe, additional keys are essential for gaining entrance to the building as quickly as possible. I'll say it again: this is for serious amateurs and experienced experts. 2) A plastic case, which is the industry standard for products in this price range. In addition, contrary to what some people believe, it does not feel like anything at all if you utilize the gadget appropriately. 3) Viewfinder. That is something I would like to see more of and in a more vivid form. Bless him, with regard to the guiding points, I find that 11 of them are sufficient for me personally. Nonetheless, even with these devices, this is the standard operating procedure for practically the whole product line. And there is no need to be concerned because this deficiency is not a deal breaker. When it comes to accurate manual focusing, the viewfinder is, in my opinion, an absolutely necessary component. And this is a specificity that is semi-professional and professional in nature. And you become accustomed to it really rapidly. 4) I would like a battery that is more powerful. Nonetheless, this behavior is usual for devices of this type. Despite everything, I still desire more! Purchase a minimum of two of these items. Look like that's it:)