Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Grzankowski ᠌ photo
1 Level
335 Review
0 Karma

Review on Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM by Wiktor Grzankowski ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Fits the description completely, very satisfying.

I' digital crop, then on 5D2 of commercial shooting was filmed on it (and sometimes all 100%), reportage style, or just a little bit of everything, even on film, I shot the best shots on it, it fell (hard) twice, with subsequent repair (the diaphragm cable failed), lost its red ring, wedding shooting, for me it is preferable than its "brothers in purpose" - 24-70 / 2.8L (I and II). Digital crop, then on 5 shoot a lot at f/2.8 and 35 for people who always have to choose between 24-105 and 24-70, shutter speed increments, and 35mm FR as opposed to a lighter 24-70. Yes, if you shoot dynamics, 2.8 from my experience, there were far fewer events with an indispensable requirement for 2.8 and in the other - three steps (stub), a stub with f/4.0 is more crucial than 2.8. In the other - three steps (stub), there were much fewer events with an indispensable need for 2.8. Those who are interested can watch as I demonstrate this using photographs taken with shutter speeds of 1/2 and 1/10. As an aside, there is a misconception that a 24 Also, on the crop, there is a description that reads as follows: Ru/photos/pr0/146915/872320 Ru/photos/74875/ Ru/forum/11/414701 - (Not discounting the 24-70 age range) If I were to do that, it would probably be during the day as I was strolling through the park. (if he had)

Pros
  • Quick, nimble, and The actual number of stages in the stub is three, although there are already lenses available with four and five steps. The champagne was poured,
Cons
  • in the crevices, the existence of XA, and so on) - well, what was it that you desired? This is not a Distagon 21/2.8, it does not have 135 points, and it has over 5 years of experience.