Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Barbara Grska ᠌ photo
1 Level
71 Review
0 Karma

Review on Gislaved Nord Frost 200 205/55 R16 94T winter by Barbara Grska ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I definitely recommend buying, I didn't notice any disadvantages.

In principle, the first winter is still only in the process, but the overall impressions are quite positive. Taking into account the fact that in this price category I didn’t actually have a choice for the right sizes (Nordman 7, the Chinese and Gislaved) - I’m happy with the choice :) The Chinese still confuse them with their potential ability to make at least comparable winter tires, according to Nordman different reviews from very good to very bad and it was a little embarrassing . i. E. it looks like a lottery, only the NF200 remained, and since there were no special questions for the NF100, I chose it.

Pros
  • Before this rubber, I took Gislaved NF100 2 times, which is not outstanding, but quite a balanced rubber for quite reasonable money. This year I decided to try the newer tires from Gislaved on a new car, of course it’s difficult to compare 200 and 100, they were on rear-wheel drive cars BMW and Mercedes, and 200 is on Nissan Qashqai with all-wheel drive. In principle, according to the sensations - 200 is approximately on the same level as the 100th, i. E. to overpay if it is possible to take 100 fresh years, there is definitely no special meaning. On dry and warm pavement (set in mid-October, and autumn 2022 turned out to be very warm), it rides quite well. It’s also great on snow, on ice I would say it glides a little more than expected for my taste . but it may seem so simple . in principle, if you don’t try to skid on purpose, it rides smoothly and predictably.
Cons
  • Probably only a slight clatter of thorns, but without it, no way.

Similar reviews