Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
πŸ‘Ÿ asics women's gt 2000 lightning running shoes: athletic performance and style logo

πŸ‘Ÿ ASICS Women's GT 2000 Lightning Running Shoes: Athletic Performance and Style Review

8

Β·

Average

Revainrating 4 out of 5Β Β 
RatingΒ 
3.9
πŸ‘Ÿ Women's Athletic Shoes, πŸ‘  Women's Shoes

View on AmazonView on Π―M

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to πŸ‘Ÿ ASICS Women's GT 2000 Lightning Running Shoes: Athletic Performance and Style
img 2 attached to πŸ‘Ÿ ASICS Women's GT 2000 Lightning Running Shoes: Athletic Performance and Style
img 3 attached to πŸ‘Ÿ ASICS Women's GT 2000 Lightning Running Shoes: Athletic Performance and Style
img 4 attached to πŸ‘Ÿ ASICS Women's GT 2000 Lightning Running Shoes: Athletic Performance and Style

Description of πŸ‘Ÿ ASICS Women's GT 2000 Lightning Running Shoes: Athletic Performance and Style

100% Manmade. Imported. Rubber sole. Heel measures approximately 1.25". Lightweight running shoe with breathable mesh upper featuring synthetic overlays. Heel Clutching System. ComforDry sockliner. I.G.S (Impact Guidance System). FluidRide midsole. Rearfoot and forefoot GEL cushioning system. AHAR rubber outsole.

Reviews

Global ratings 8
  • 5
    2
  • 4
    4
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Tiny finger box and you pay $5 to return it

Based on the rave reviews I was hoping they would fit. Toe is tiny. I've never had a problem finding my right size for me, but that was with this one. What's particularly annoying is that they deducted $5.13 from the refund. So I paid to try them on for 20 minutes and felt uncomfortable. Wouldn't recommend them, find someone who cares about the customer.

Pros
  • New to my collection
Cons
  • Something's wrong

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Not as good as previous models

I've worn this shoe for many years because I have a little wide foot, but I wear a size 5.5 in all shoes, even the older models of these shoes. I've loved this shoe for the past several years, in part because the overpronation support has been so good. I find this shoe provides enough arch support but not enough support for my overpronation. My usual size, 5.5, is too small for me and my toes go numb 2 miles after running 3 miles. I lace my shoes to minimize the pressure on my feet, but I still

Pros
  • Special offer
Cons
  • The list will go on.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

changed my mind! good for trail running

I overpronate, have high arches and heel/midfoot landings. I need inner foot support, arch pad and heel pad. So basically I'm a picky shoe shopper and these were recommended to me! I was initially skeptical and didn't like them, I even considered returning them but decided to try them first before making such a judgement. Completely changed my mind! He supported my legs in all the right places. The toe box is a bit shorter than what I'm used to and I even ordered half a size up, that would be…

Pros
  • Certified
Cons
  • Hard to tell

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Great shoes if you buy a larger size!

I bought my first pair of GT-2000s half a size up just for the feel in the store and although the cushioning is fantastic when I walk on the treadmill the shoes have been rubbing and painfully pinching mine toes. After reading reviews on this and other shoes I ordered another pair of Asics GT-2000, a full size up and the widest width I could find (I usually wear W but ordered EE) and they are perfect! It appears that Asics has narrowed the toe of this shoe more than in the past, leading to toe…

Pros
  • Looking forward to it
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Still a good product nonetheless.

I have been buying Asics shoes for over 20 years and have always been very satisfied. This is a good product. Although I didn't take the advice to go half a size larger than normal, I did notice that the shoe felt a little more comfortable than my previous purchases, which would have been perfect out of the box. However, after a few wears, the shoes became looser and more comfortable. I've also noticed that forefoot cushioning seems to be less than I remember, but heel cushioning is adequate. I

Pros
  • Well built
Cons
  • Appearance

Revainrating 5 out of 5

great for flat feet

The first ones I got were too short from toe to heel and my last shoe (NIKE) was an 8 so I had to return it and got it 8.5 2E because they also felt a bit narrow in width. Maybe they are a bit small and tight and you should take half a size bigger. I loved that I could send them back to Amazon for free and they replaced my 8 with an 8.5 :) I have flat feet so I even ordered this style and now that I'm the right size they feel great on. I definitely recommend them for people with flat feet. I…

Pros
  • High marks for support and durability from testers
Cons
  • Slightly torn

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Disappointed best in shoes

As a nurse I can't usually say enough good things about Asics. I have purchased several of their shoes for work and love the arch support and durability they offer for my specific job. Unfortunately I cannot give this particular shoe the same rating. After less than 4 months of wear (yes I can usually last at least 8+ months from a pair of work shoes) they fall apart. I only wear these shoes to work (and then only 3 days a week) and they have worn holes in the upper of the shoe. I had these…

Pros
  • New
Cons
  • Little things

I have narrow feet AND I have holes in my feet when running. I typically run about 3 miles per run 3 times a week on average, so I have to buy a new pair of running shoes every 6 months. There aren't usually many Pronather shoes that come in cool or desirable colors (I despise pink) and when they do fit I've only had pink. So I tried on cooler colors from different brands, desperately hoping to find better shoes with better style, but this GT-2000-3 loved my feet more than I loved its style…

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • Can hurt