Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
πŸ‘š high-performance upf 50+ body glove women's sleek long sleeve rashguard logo

πŸ‘š High-Performance UPF 50+ Body Glove Women's Sleek Long Sleeve Rashguard Review

3

Β·

Average

Revainrating 3 out of 5Β Β 
RatingΒ 
3.0
πŸ‘™ Women's Swimsuits & Cover Ups, πŸ‘— Women's Clothing

View on AmazonView on Π―M

Media

(3)
img 1 attached to πŸ‘š High-Performance UPF 50+ Body Glove Women's Sleek Long Sleeve Rashguard
img 2 attached to πŸ‘š High-Performance UPF 50+ Body Glove Women's Sleek Long Sleeve Rashguard
img 3 attached to πŸ‘š High-Performance UPF 50+ Body Glove Women's Sleek Long Sleeve Rashguard

Description of πŸ‘š High-Performance UPF 50+ Body Glove Women's Sleek Long Sleeve Rashguard

87% Nylon, 13% Spandex. Imported. No Closure closure. Hand Wash Only. UPF 50+ ultraviolent protection factor. Long sleeves, low profile crew neck. Flatlock seams. Click "Size Chart" above to consult our fit guide to determine which size will fit you best. Click our logo above to visit our store page and view the Smoothies Sleek rashguard and other styles within the Smoothies collection!

Reviews

Global ratings 3
  • 5
    1
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Poor Quality Rashguard

As my tests showed, this rashguard is not suitable for swimming. It does not hold up well in chlorinated water, fading quickly and losing its shape after just a few wears. The color of the rashguard is also not as depicted online, appearing dull and unflattering.

Pros
  • None
Cons
  • Poor quality, not suitable for swimming.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Looks great with the wrong bottom.

It wasn't too hot as long as I stayed in the shade. Swimsuit of decent thickness made of material. not easy quick drying or cheap feel. dries quickly etc.

Pros
  • Flat seams
Cons
  • Hard to say

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Nothing beats an old body glove!

I am so disappointed with BodyGlove. From the end of 2016 to 2018 and up to now! The quality of the rashguard material is terrible. They are not at all as beautiful, soft and thick as before. For example with a collection of smoothies. This is a big disappointment as I swim five days a week and need it to keep me warm. Since they were born in 1953 they have NEVER compromised customer satisfaction or used low to medium quality materials. In the 70's, 80's and up until (about) 2013 this was the…

Pros
  • UV protection factor UPF 50+
Cons
  • Compatibility