Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
canon powershot sx60 hs - capture stunning photos with black finish logo

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - Capture Stunning Photos with Black Finish Review

9

·

Very good

Revainrating 4 out of 5  
Rating 
4.2
Electronics, 📷 Camera & Photo, 📷 Camera & Photo Accessories, 📷 Camera & Photo

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - Capture Stunning Photos with Black Finish
img 2 attached to Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - Capture Stunning Photos with Black Finish
img 3 attached to Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - Capture Stunning Photos with Black Finish
img 4 attached to Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - Capture Stunning Photos with Black Finish

Photos by authors

(9)
img 5 attached to Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - Capture Stunning Photos with Black Finish
img 6 attached to Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - Capture Stunning Photos with Black Finish
img 7 attached to Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - Capture Stunning Photos with Black Finish
img 8 attached to Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - Capture Stunning Photos with Black Finish

Description of Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - Capture Stunning Photos with Black Finish

camera type: compact, effective sensor megapixels: 16.10, maximum movie recording resolution: 1920x1080, maximum movie frame rate: 240 fps, viewfinder type: electronic, Optical Zoom: 65, image stabilizer (still image): optical, screen size: 3", screen: swivel, work in viewfinder mode

Reviews

Global ratings 9
  • 5
    4
  • 4
    4
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

a brief summary of the above: satisfied with the camera, almost fully met expectations (I understood that I was buying an inexpensive soap dish with ultra-zoom) paid more attention to the shortcomings than the advantages of the camera, tk. for some, this may turn out to be critical, although the fotik has more pluses than minuses I thought for a long time to put 4 or 3, I decided to put 3 . the main factors: poor stabilization, unfinished auto modes (which is very critical for a soapbox) and…

Pros
  • 1. zoom 65x 2. WiFi (but very slow, transmission through the cord is approximately 4.5 times faster) 3. photosensitivity of norms, the quality is not very good, but you can take a photo in semi-darkness or by a fire without a flash 4. I read complaints about the regular battery in the reviews, but in fact I didn’t get a dead battery, I took about 200 pictures (the part with a flash), shot three video clips, transferred a hundred pictures through the usb cable, and transferred the second hundred to the computer via Wi-Fi. . until the battery sank one notch 5. cool mode with auto-processing of photos 6. The video is in mp4 format (stereo sound only), you can immediately view it without conversion
Cons
  • 1. very large noise in the photo (on auto-settings, for example, on a cheap A480 soap dish - there is less grain) 2. the display is not touch 3. the flash must be raised with the handles (in principle, it is not critical, but on the SX100 it pops up automatically, on the s110 the flash pops up and retracts by itself) 4. heavy, much heavier than the SX100 (which was bought instead) 5. according to the characteristics of 16.8 MP, but this is a 4:3 photo format, in fact I use the 16:9 format, which is available only at 12 MP 6. in auto mode, sharpness aims at the background, and not at the subject, does not catch focus well in low light

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

I must say right away: my hands are still crooked, and before the Guru of the photo I am like before the Moon shown in the photo! Plus, do not forget: professional photography is in 99% of cases a processed photograph, and I still have to learn and learn this too. So the jambs in the photo are not the result of a bad camera, but the result of my inability to photograph. And most importantly - do not forget: the best camera is not the one that you need to assemble for 20 years - but the one that

Pros
  • This is my first real camera (after a smartphone and a simple soap dish). What can I say: the camera is cool - both in management, and in use, and in development. Lots of settings, lots of possibilities. I took it mainly for landscape photography, including for shooting the starry sky. I don't regret the money spent. Now I just need to learn how to use it :-)
Cons
  • Have not found. ========== All complaints about noise, slow RAW speed, non-touch display, slow autofocus in low light, etc. I consider nitpicking: from an amateur compact camera, people want the quality of a professional SLR camera! Wonders. Excellent camera.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product did not disappoint, the quality pleases.

It is a pity that the model left the market. An interesting camera for fun and shooting in ideal conditions. I am satisfied with the purchase. There are no wide angle compacts on the market below 24mm.

Pros
  • Fully met expectations. I did not expect a miracle, I took it for the sake of a good wide angle (equiv. 21 mm) and a close macro - these indicators satisfied me. The huge zoom range is a very nice added feature. I dabbled for a week - I shot birds, I have a feeder on the site. Management - a copy from the previous Canon S100 soap box
Cons
  • There were no surprises: noise under all conditions, except for a bright sunny meadow - the matrix is ​​tiny, the aperture ratio is small. In the viewfinder, with a lack of light, nothing is visible at all, but the screen saves.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent Zoom on This Camera!

When I tried this product, I was impressed with the incredibly sharp photos I took thanks to its 65x zoom capabilities. The image stabilization system is effective even at high zoom levels. Plus, the intuitive controls make it easy to use.

Pros
  • Impressive zoom, great image quality, easy to use controls.
Cons
  • Despite the compact design, it is still quite bulky and heavy to carry around. Overall, this camera is a reliable choice for anyone looking to capture high-quality photos and videos on their next Electronics adventure.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Well done, but I won't buy any more.

I used this camera for over a year for macro, landscapes and bird shooting, then switched to the EOS 60D. In my opinion, the main advantage of this camera is the ability to try everything in photography at once and understand what exactly you need. A good option for beginner photographers or as a second camera for more advanced ones. Its pros: + Very strong zoom + Very fast continuous shooting in JPEG, a series of up to 10 frames does not slow down + Large range of focal lengths. Suitable for

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend it.

1. To be honest, I'm shocked. Charged the battery for the first time. For some time I climbed through the settings, then I put in a memory card, I managed to take a dozen pictures and three videos for a minute, well, import via Wi-Fi to the computer. That's all. And the battery is dead! In short, for a Wi-Fi device, this is nice, but for a regular battery, this is a complete skiff! Use only with AKC-DC80 adapter. Also, very slowly. Then it will be more convenient, the old proven USB. 2. Of…

Pros
  • Large range of focal lengths. Unexpectedly well shoots in the "green" zone.
Cons
  • 1. Small controls. 2. Very weak battery. 3. Insufficiently functional attached software.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

I did not like it, I do not advise buying.

With its pros. Ability to shoot in RAW and in 16/9 format (wide angle photo). Good video quality. Ultrazoom. Landscapes are good. Good Japanese build. Cons: Matrix 1/2.3 is too small for 16 megapixels. Shooting indoors still requires manual modes.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

I have been using canon for 8 years now (S3 IS, 600D, 430 EX II, a bunch of lenses). I was looking for a superzoom for shooting birds. Disappointed. Now I would take the Panasonic Lumix FZ200 - at least the zoom is smaller, but the pictures are better (constant aperture of the lens F2.8) and 600mm is already an excellent zoom + there is something to make a crop from (not porridge like here) or something from the Sony RX10 for the same reason)

Pros
  • Huge zoom, fast continuous shooting, WiFi and photo-video upload to the cloud, Camera Window smartphone-tablet application (viewfinder, shutter, zoom, photo review and upload), two custom C1 / C2 settings, HDR, resolution cropping for shooting with hands, RAW, macro, connector for an external microphone, connector for an external flash, video FullHD 60p, VGA 120p, a bunch of effects (out of the unusual - video digest), Zoom-Assist with a separate button.
Cons
  • handheld night shooting raises ISO and everything becomes a mess already from 1600, soap-soap at 65x, no panorama (StitchAssist), no touchscreen, no editor (except crop-contrast), no intervalometer (Timelapse), manual focus is difficult (no separate lever), no ISO button (and you can’t assign it to S), inconvenient cross for selecting functions on the rear panel, quite expensive

I have a canon sx50hs device, I have been using it for more than a year, and at least it is still the best for me . and it was made more than 2 years ago . if you do not take into account wifi, nfc, then the rest of the devices identical . because the crop factor is the same . 1 / 2.3 . if the matrix was ​​larger, let's say zoom up to 100 times and megapixels about 41, in addition wifi, nfc, then you could say that the device was successful even ahead of time by several years . and so we can…

Pros
  • I will be extremely frank and note that over the past two years, after the sx50 model, canon has not added so many innovations in this device . only wifi, nfc have been added here, the zoom has been increased from 50 to 65 . the handle has become a little comfortable, the body material much more pleasant, and finally, the company managed to maintain its position in the ultrasonic segment . it would be a shame to lose this segment, especially since it was the firstborn in this industry .
Cons
  • I don't know yet, I didn't notice any flaws.