Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 30
  • 5
    22
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    4
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Expectations were not met, average quality.

A camera designed for photographers in the industry, although with the earlier model, it was feasible! The camera has an outstanding autofocus in live view as well as when shooting video; this is extremely very convenient, and as a result, you start snapping 30–40% of your images in this mode. II has and in more affordable models also has this feature. About the video in its own right: yeah, it's a camera, and it has no business shooting video at all; but, Kenon was the first company to…

Pros
  • Color signature, quick autofocus, waterproofing, high-speed continuous photography, shutter sound, autofocus in movie mode and live view, built-in wireless internet connectivity, and a screen are all features of this camera.
Cons
  • Video recording capabilities, restricted functionality, a portion of the body is now made of plastic, there is no option to capture a picture while the camera is recording video, the screen is fixed, and there are only three user-defined color profiles available. When trying to photograph, the camera keeps freezing up!

Revainrating 2 out of 5

I didn't like it, I don't recommend buying.

The owner of a Canon 5D Mark 2 considered upgrading because technology advances constantly. There was a 5D Mark 2 on display in the storefront window until 2012, yet the price of a subscription to any of the nine glossy magazines that have appeared since then has not increased by more than $200. When deciding between the Canon 5D Mark 4 and 5D Mark 2, I leased this camera for $1,750 for a day before making a purchase. The Canon RP was another camera I compared the 5D Mark 2 to, and it came up…

Pros
  • Capture images by touching the screen and adjusting the focus manually.
Cons
  • The matrix is just as bad, if not worse, than the Canon 5D Mark 2 2012.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing special, there are positive and negative sides.

I have been a customer of yours for a very long time. In the past, I have purchased and utilized the 350d, 1D MARK III, 5D mark II, 5D mark III, and 5D mark II. At this point, I only have one 5D mark III. I recently attended a presentation for the new Sony A9 and the new 100-400. the focus distance is set at 70 meters. and now let's try a 5 with those parameters. Therefore, Sapozhok was unable to defeat A9 in the speed of continuous shooting, he failed to focus, he was unable to give out 24…

Pros
  • but less than seven pounds
Cons
  • there is not even a fair level of working ISO when compared to the competition, there is no stabilization on the matrix, and there are not even four high noise levels.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

I had 5d mark 2, 6d mark 2. 5d mark 4 if you choose between Sony a7 m3 and this mark 4, then kenon 5d mark 4 is certainly better in terms of control and build quality, and its matrix is ​​​​no worse than Sony

Pros
  • Excellent device, still very relevant in 2021 performs all the functions Advantages - clean matrix, fast aperture, little noise, Wi-Fi, phone control
Cons
  • the price is too big for 2021

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

especially as it turned out in the dual pixel technology, the whole picture in the bright areas is completely available, by lenses; both (two) with an aperture of 1.2 work accurately and beautifully,

Cons
  • and there is no information left, help with D+ doesn' tamron work fine only with disabled lens enhancers in the camera settings.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

the noise is slightly less, at 16000 so I can’ like me, are engaged in photography, and have a third mark or choose between 3 and 4, I recommend waiting for the release of the fifth - the extra megapixels are not particularly important (there are only 8 more of them), the shutter noise is much lower, but not worth it moreover, except perhaps because of the speed of shooting.

Pros
  • for a series it turns out to shoot 17 raw-frames instead of 13 on a triple

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable yet competent low-budget full-frame camera

If, like me, you need an optical viewfinder with an optical viewfinder more than aps-c, full-frame image character and are not afraid to lose ergonomics and the future of camera, then this camera could be a good option for you. I have some experience with Aps-C cameras like Canon XSI, 40D, T1I, T3, Nikon D7000, D3000, D300 and Micro 4/3 cameras like Panasonic Lumix GX1 and Olympus EPL1 and none of them can characterize the picture so convey a full 5d frame can give. Obviously there's something…

Pros
  • An absolute legend
Cons
  • Expensive

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great camera, suitable for stills and photos

While the 5D may be cheaper than the so-called Pro level, the camera is more geared towards the Pro end than the 20D (or 30D) with fewer dials but more Features. Others cover some other areas so I'll try not to repeat myself. Full frame means a lot to me. I like to print large images and use L or other high end Canon lenses (with a few imitations). There are no compromises in terms of weight or compactness. The truth is I prefer newer glass that isn't designed for a smaller sensor. I really…

Pros
  • Weight
Cons
  • Some small things

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Switching from Nikon to DSLR

Switching from Nikon to Canon was difficult (and expensive), but it was worth it. I've always felt that my Nikon could be sharper. I went to Canon for lenses and I'm not disappointed and neither are you. The D5 with the 24-105L series lens is a great setup, extremely versatile. This is not a compromise camera. Is it perfect, no, but a very, very good camera and lens. I mainly use this camera to photograph artworks. I use strobe lights and sometimes available light or a 580ex flash. The lens is…

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • Switching