Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 43
  • 5
    29
  • 4
    13
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are pros and cons, think before buying.

A very controversial camera, despite many positive reviews and reviews. The final picture, in my opinion, is worse than on 16 megapixel cameras such as Nikon D5100, Pentax K-5 in most cases. They use a 14-digit ADC, unlike the 12 of the D3300. As a result, I managed to change to the D5100 and the discomfort of unjustified expectations disappeared. Pros below: Most likely a good camera for landscapes at ISO 100 and on a tripod. With its cons. Noticeable noise at ISO above 800, microblur on…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

I bought it in January 2022 for 30,000. Used a little, but systematically. I can only compare with a soap box, but as for me, a good amateur camera. At the time of purchase was probably the best in its class in terms of price-quality ratio. As I wrote above, you cannot trust the LCD display, in general. Has pros: A handy camera, imparts color objectively (taking into account the disadvantage), a good optical zoom, stretches the image in the dark with a relatively low exposure time, good video…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm impressed! Exactly the product deserves your attention.

I chose a DSLR for a very long time, read a lot, asked the opinion of knowledgeable people, remembered my not very successful experience with the camera. canon . in the end, the choice fell on the d3300. The camera is just amazing! even in auto mode, excellent pictures are obtained, incomparable with soap ones. It’s nice to hold it in my hands, I can’t get enough of it, I carry it everywhere and tinker with it all the time, like a child with a new favorite toy) By the way, maybe it will be…

Pros
  • compact, light, beautiful, photo quality - the plague is simple! very easy to use, BUT still I advise you to read the instructions, there are a lot of useful points. The whale lens is excellent, I didn’t even expect it . I thought I’d have to go extra. to buy a lens, as a result, for my amateur purposes, the lens that is included is enough above the roof.
Cons
  • they just don't exist

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

I got it with the AF-P 18-55 VR lens, I didn’t regret it, the lens for the street is excellent, autofocus is fast and silent, it helps a lot when shooting video, there is something to compare with. I thought about buying another lens, better and brighter, but I realized that later I’ll buy the D 600 for photos, and leave the D 3300 for video. And it’s not so a pity to take it with you everywhere, and the image quality is enough for everyday use.

Pros
  • Small size and weight, all the same, sometimes they are also important. Excellent image quality, only autofocus misses. Silent lens motor, fast focusing with AF-P 18-55 VR lens. High available ISO values, many shooting modes. The resolution of the photo is quite enough, the pictures, if you get to the point, are very sharp, no worse with the D 800. Works well with my old Sigma EF 500 flash. The stabilizer helps, although it is turned on through the menu.
Cons
  • I understand that the price corresponds to the offer, but the upper display is terribly lacking, I previously used the D 80 and my father's D800. There are also few buttons, I would like to quickly control ISO, etc. Could not work with 50 1.8 even in manual mode. I would like more autonomy, the new D 3400 seems to have a larger battery, but you should not overpay. USB non-standard. No lens hood included. The lens mount is plastic, but if you do not change it often, I think there will be no problems.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

It's the best purchase I ever made, I will definitely do it again.

A good SLR for amateurs. Pros, of course, will prefer a different set, at least optics. For the tasks of an amateur, more than enough. I would not even advise you to change the optics if you do not accurately and clearly understand the differences between different lenses. The standard lens shoots very well. Many negative reviews do not speak about the quality of the device, but about the lack of basic knowledge and photography skills. Fully automatic mode and a sufficient number of presets…

Pros
  • Ergonomic and lightweight body, fits well in the hand, easy to control; Excellent matrix, powerful processor, good focusing system, convenient viewfinder, high shooting speed; A very high-quality regular lens - if you understand photography, the pictures will delight; The auto modes are well chosen and enough manual settings are provided; For beginners, there is a training mode with a detailed guide
Cons
  • Minor: - Own types of USB connectors, respectively, special separate cables. It would be time to use the common micro-USB; - No USB charging. Many modern camcorders powered by more than 5V are able to charge from USB, and it is convenient to charge the device without removing the battery; - File numbering system: when the choice of numbering image files by date and time appears, as in many other devices more caring for the user's convenience - this order does not require thinking about file sorting - everything itself lines up in chronology; - Included is only a belt for the neck, there is no belt for the hand; - Lens cap without lanyard - easy to lose.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Quality of the product is at the level, I will recommend this product

I used Nikon 3100 for a very long time, then I bought Nikon 3300 I didn’t feel a big difference, I used both with Sigma 17-50 / 2.8 But I didn’t want to talk about this: gentlemen, check the mileage of the fotik, even if you buy from a worthy seller, don’t be greedy. 28 07 2022 bought Nikon 3300 in Ulmart, delivery, today 10 08 2022 checked the mileage, without any ulterior motive, 421 frames, 42 pictures on the map. For 7 years of operation, Nikon 3100 has accumulated 2506 frames for me, you

Pros
  • Weight, size, not bad pictures.
Cons
  • The fact that the pictures are just not bad.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

Today, this is one of the best cameras for beginner photographers. There are all the basic functions and shooting modes, with a relatively small size and weight. A 24 MP sensor without an anti-alias filter and the latest Expeed 4 processor (the same as on professional D4s / D810 cameras) produce excellent pictures, and if you put a good fast lens instead of a dark whale lens, then it will be difficult to distinguish photos from professional ones. cameras. And all this at a very seductive price…

Pros
  • Great model for beginner photographers! Best Ratio price-quality-functionality!
Cons
  • In comments:

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best product, from those that I have viewed, I advise everyone!

I took it in May for 30 with a new AF-P 18-55 VR lens. In short, a very good camera for beginners. all functions are described in detail very clearly in the camera itself, there is no need for instructions. Plus, a fairly adequate automatic mode (which I do not use). For amateurs, the camera is also suitable. If you use semi-automatic modes, then the control is very convenient. The parameters that you use most often change with a couple of clicks. For less important ones, you will have to…

Pros
  • Weight, handling, picture quality, burst speed 5 fps
Cons
  • Burst buffer for a maximum of 7 shots.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

I have always loved taking pictures. I bought a NIKON D3300 Kit 18-55 II after another disappointment from the photos taken at my daughter's New Year's party, for which we had been preparing for a long time, choosing an outfit, hairstyle, hair decoration, etc., etc. . but in the end, zilch. . it was a pity to look at the photo, and now, angry at my shortsightedness, I decided to fork out and finally buy a worthwhile thing in order to enjoy later, looking through the chronicle of events and…

Pros
  • the best ratio of price and characteristics of a product from DSLRs in my opinion, high light sensitivity (25,600) + weight of only 460 g + price + manufacturer Thailand, etc.
Cons
  • Have not been identified yet, I hope for their absence in the future, well, perhaps the weight, but compared to other devices . it is lighter, and for a serious thing this is not a hindrance, I think that the quality of the photo compensates for this

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

the price of the camera is slightly overpriced (after all, it’s a novelty), it is very demanding on optics, I explain why, there is such a thing as the optical resolution of the lens, and since. a 24 MP matrix, appropriate optics are required, as a rule, kit lenses are initially designed for a smaller number of megapixels, even though the camera is a class of beginner photographers, it can shoot much more.

Pros
  • intuitive camera, 5 fps, compact and lightweight, good batteries, you can even find a butblock, real 24 MP
Cons
  • requires very high quality optics, no camera support in photoshop

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I like the product very much, fully consistent with my expectations.

I use this carcass with a regular whale of the first revision 18-55 without a stub, with autofocus and the pictures are already quite pleasing If I put fast Soviet fixes, then I get a completely universal, very fast bunch for any situations. I am sure that this camera is great for both a novice photographer and an advanced amateur photographer. Good luck with your pictures.

Pros
  • Ergonomically remarkable body for an initial DSLR best performance in its segment an extensive fleet of lenses for nikon, sigma, tamron, zenith, etc.
Cons
  • Of the minuses, I can only note the slow-down "live view" photo mode on the screen - this mode is necessary when working periodically with manual old optics

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

I have been using it for more than a year, as a beginner everything suits me, although I would like to have a screwdriver (so as not to bother with lenses). I took it several times on trips, everything is fine, it endures both 35 degrees of heat and -15 cold in the mountains. Due to its dimensions, it is a very good camera for vacation, the weight is small and the dimensions are not large. I chose between 3300 and 5300, saved on wi fi and a rotary screen (no difference anymore) and I don’t…

Pros
  • weight, size, price (at the time of purchase 24t. ) matrix. Whale lens (18-55 VR II) Convenient button layout
Cons
  • no screwdriver. At the moment, the price is already about 30 t. (but analogues are also getting more expensive)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

due to the combination of cheap + light + durable - it fulfills its purpose for 5 ++. I'm not afraid to take it for diving. to the mountains. field exits. fishing. give it to small children to take a picture (and the photos come out hilarious from the perspective of a person who is less than a meter tall). give drunk people on the road and so on. and Nikon 3300 doesn’t care at all, throw it to the bottom of the boat, forget it on the street in front of the tent, pack it on the bottom of the…

Pros
  • - for its price - the quality of photos and videos right out of the box is excellent. can not be compared with any soap dishes or top-end phones for 100+ thousand. - light - works for a long time -Easy to learn and manage. -quick. - takes good photos in any light and even at night the pictures are beautiful. - auto settings work well. and during the day that at night the pictures are excellent
Cons
  • - 4k3 aspect ratio is outdated for 30 years already. but in general, many new cameras are still produced with this aspect ratio, and when you switch soft to 16k9, the photo quality drops to unacceptable. - a Nikon feature, with the fact that it’s tedious to “turn on” the lens before photographing and “turn it off” after work - this is the biggest minus that cannot be forgiven. well, no way. poisons life. -in the default settings, it's a bit yellow. but this is generally a feature of the Nikon company. not tied to the model. they generally have all the cameras of all the rulers always yellow pictures. because people were divided into 2 camps, someone is a nikon, someone is a canon. it depends on the individual device of the eye, etc. how a particular person perceives shades. for example, pictures from canon seem to me like "natural color reproduction", and nikon - yellow. to someone on the contrary, nikon seems natural, and canon makes the pictures bluish. It's not really a flaw - it's a feature. as well as food preferences. -video shoots in 1080, which is not enough -autofocus as far as I understand in this camera (as in almost all) - no. The focus of the video is made by pressing the shutter button. pressed - it focused on the object. released - he fixed. I mean, you can shoot a video, and I shoot, but this is already such a camera work in essence. but I repeat such quality for such money and even on the machine - excellent.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

Just started taking photographs. I chose a month and eventually bought 3300. There was only one in our city for sale. for 22900. Plus 500 discount on the next purchase. took a bag and a memory card. Made well. Everything is at hand. Kitovskiy lens DX VRII. I chose according to the parameters: Powerful processor of the latest generation. Full HD 1920*1080 video up to 60 frames per second.

Pros
  • Compact DSLR with compact lens
Cons
  • not found

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the quality is good, the price is reasonable.

Before that, I used the d3100 for six months, I compare it with it. Landscapes are subjectively worse, portraits are better. Less like color reproduction. Autofocus often misses, in 3100 I did not notice this. I bought it for test photos from imaging-resource, it seemed that the noise was sorted out in the new model. But it was not there. Noises are depressing at more than 3100. Even at iso 100. (Maybe a purely Japanese copy was tested there, mine was made in Thailand). The stabilizer…

Pros
  • Comfortable grip, buttons, interface The lens does not rotate when focusing, you can put a petal hood Lens stabilizer Surprisingly good built-in flash Improved Battery Great video (but with focus issues)
Cons
  • Noises Autofocus often misses Dust tightness

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Quality of the product is at the level, I will recommend this product

I bought a DSLR about 3 months ago, as for an amateur camera, everything is fine, if you learn how to shoot on manual settings, you get very spectacular photos - voluminous and deep, I see no reason to buy such a camera and shoot on the machine. Of the advantages, I want to note a rather simple control, an understandable manual for the camera. If you are a beginner photographer, then both the camera and the kit lens are perfect! It will help you learn how to take pictures and understand what…

Pros
  • good value for money, accessible controls (even for beginners)
Cons
  • so far haven't noticed

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

As the first camera - one of the best options for photography. Portraits, street, landscapes - everything is suitable if there is a suitable optics. For photo shoots, that's it. You can also shoot a beautiful video backstage. But if you take something specifically for video, then you need a quick love view, convenient settings and a swivel display, so in this case it's better to look towards something else.

Pros
  • You can safely take a used one for 10 thousand. You need to take body (without a lens) and buy good fixes (35mm or 50mm). Thanks to their aperture of 1.8, you will get those very beautiful photos with blur, depth and sharpness. Cheap zooms, which include the whale lens, are, firstly, dark, and secondly, less sharp and have strong optical distortions.
Cons
  • Sometimes autofocus misses. It's best to always take 5 shots with refocus to be sure. I keep throwing out the focus point by random taps on the navipad. Shockingly slow live view. There is no proximity sensor to the face to automatically turn off the screen. Some settings are not available in movie mode. It seems that there are some custom firmware, but not my topic.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

The device turned out to be very successful. I chose a camera for 3 weeks, having studied everything in 2022 and English-language photo sites. I compared the pixel-by-pixel detail of the original photographs of different mirror and mirrorless cameras. If you need maximum photo quality with minimum money, then you won’t find a better camera (who disagree - email me). Brake Liveview and the lack of tracking focus cannot completely replace a video camera for you, but in DSLRs are a secondary

Pros
  • Photo quality. In this camera, it is the same as on older models - up to d7200. After all, the matrix and processor are the same. Even at high ISO and shooting at night, the photo quality is noticeably better than most competitors up to 50k. R. Price for this photo quality. Good video quality. Honest 60fps writes even in poor lighting, but not at night. At the same time, the sound also writes normally, but in mono. Compact size (for DSLR) Nice clear and bright screen. Visible in the sun. At angles, the image does not get worse. A good kit lens that comes with a stabilizer. Excellent assembly, no backlash or creaks, a feeling of solidity and strength of the device. Although this seems to be characteristic of most DSLRs. On the battery, you can easily pull out about 1000 frames from a single charge (hello to mirrorless cameras with their 240-350 frames!).
Cons
  • Exposure metering here is not entirely clear. You often have to stretch the shadows and eliminate the highlights. Therefore, I recommend shooting in NEF (RAW). No 4k video recording. And iron seems to allow this to be done. Now this is relevant, given that even a smartphone for 10 it can do it, but a DSLR for 25 - no! No tracking focus when shooting video. And, therefore, you can use this SLR as a video camera, mainly when shooting static objects, or use manual focus. Diopter adjustment in the viewfinder is extremely small here! But you can buy a lens. There is no built-in remapping of hot and dead pixels, as in Canon! There is no HDR, but the d5300 has it for a completely different price. There is no folding screen - when shooting macro, something low (bugs or flowers) or high (at a concert above people's heads), it is very lacking. But there is also in the d5300. Not touch screen.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A practical product, nothing to complain about.

On the D50 it was very convenient to quickly view information about the picture - 5 screens that change by pressing the selector on the back cover - there was a histogram among other things. I didn't find it here. Sadly. But all sorts of fake whistles like dirt - the animation of everything (moving photos during viewing, turning the shutter speed, aperture, ISO), some crazy effects (does anyone use them?). The camera as a disk did not appear in either USB2 or USB3 sockets. Photos managed to be…

Pros
  • Probably the cheapest camera I've ever bought after my D50 broke down a bit. Focuses quickly.
Cons
  • Did not like: - I can not find how to see the histogram on the photo - it is not defined as a media when connected to a computer via a USB cord - perhaps you need to select something in the menu or the connector is broken - I can’t find why yet (maybe it should work only from their program, because only such a method is described in the instructions, but I don't want to install their program yet) - bad without LCD indicator, but maybe it's a matter of time - acquire new habits - 5 focus points in the D50 were enough for everything and you could quickly switch between them, here there are 11 of them - accordingly, the selection efficiency is reduced

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product did not disappoint, the quality pleases.

Nikon really understood correctly what a person needs who has realized the worthlessness of a mobile phone as a photo camera. As an entry-level camera after a smartphone, it's just a dream. A jump into the world of serious quality photography that you can take yourself. Having only 12,000, for everything about everything. And for staged shots, expensive equipment is not needed at all.

Pros
  • 1. Price. Especially now that they're selling slightly used for $150. The people are changing. Last year - 30,000. Now 10,000. 2. Lens. I'm serious. The common man will be pleased. I spent a lot of time studying the line of optics (lenses) for cameras from this company. All of them - except for the top ones, at an UNREAL price - all have flaws. There is a stereotype (imposed on the masses) that you need to get rid of the KIT and buy a fix, or an advanced expensive universal lens (for holidays and travel). All this is a LIE. A quality photo is the sum of factors: hands, brain, eyes, the ability to talk to the model (the charisma of the artist). Plus some luck. A nice young guy or girl with a simple camera will be more successful than an old one . with poor eyesight, with an expensive unit. They write that this lens, KIT, darkens and turns yellow. So shoot with light! A good photo is LIGHT. The camera has a built-in flash. She's super helpful. 3. Autofocus is better and faster than manual focusing. It was a shock for me. 4. Programs embedded in the camera - really make shooting easy. You can direct your concentration to the situation itself, to the plot of the shooting, and grabbing luck by the tail when the picture is taken - just brilliant.
Cons
  • User's manual. 500 pages. Hell and tin. This OK need to to read 3 times - to remember. The technique has become complicated. In Soviet times, there was Zenit, and how easy it was with him! What photos did he take? Then came the semi-automatic, small and light "Elikon 35C", the dream of a dynamic photographer. The shooting process was simple, it was part of life. It was a pleasure.