PUMA Basic Sneaker Little Silver Girls' Shoes for Athletic Review

The description of this particular shoe needs to be updated. This leads you to believe that these shoes are the same as they refer to their 1968 shoe, which had comfort-enhancing features like a thickly padded tongue and orthopedic arch. It's not like this. The tongue is thinner than any basic athletic shoe in my opinion and they are uncomfortable. Luckily I have the insoles and love the look and style of them so will keep them but the description was misleading in my case.

I needed a new pair of pure white leather sneakers and they matched the description perfectly! The price was great as they were for school and only used 2-3 times a week. They are a bit tight and uncomfortable at times after prolonged wear, but I feel this is common with most slim fit shoes. Arch support is minimal, especially if you have flat feet like me, but adding insoles helps. I have no regrets about the purchase and I'm glad they were affordable!

It was what I expected. My 10 year old son wore them for about 1.5 months and then they ripped and ripped around the toe and the heel rubber came off. He usually changes shoes quickly (4-6 months) as he has heavy feet, but it was too quick. I think it's because there's no hard rubber on the outside of the shoe, just leather, and the rubber sticks out on the sole.? I don't know, but he clearly didn't stand a chance. Unfortunately I won't be buying Puma again.