Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
saucony womens versafoam extol running logo

Saucony Womens VERSAFOAM Extol Running Review

2

·

Terrible

Revainrating 1.5 out of 5  
Rating 
1.7
👟 Women's Athletic Shoes, 👠 Women's Shoes

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Saucony Womens VERSAFOAM Extol Running
img 2 attached to Saucony Womens VERSAFOAM Extol Running
img 3 attached to Saucony Womens VERSAFOAM Extol Running
img 4 attached to Saucony Womens VERSAFOAM Extol Running

Description of Saucony Womens VERSAFOAM Extol Running

Synthetic-and-mesh. Imported. Rubber sole. Shaft measures approximately low-top from arch. VERSAFOAM responsive cushioning technology. Internal bootie in the upper laces snug for a great fit. Streamlined breathable mesh upper.

Reviews

Global ratings 2
  • 5
    0
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disappointing Women's Athletic Shoes

Based on my observations these shoes fail to meet my expectations for women`s fashion in athletic footwear. They lack style and are clunky. The only pro I can think of is that they provide decent support. However, the cons far outweigh this benefit. Overall, I would not recommend these shoes to anyone looking for fashionable women's athletic shoes..

Pros
  • Comfortable and supportive design for running
Cons
  • Not recommended for activities other than running due to its specialized design

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Amazing colors but terrible tongue design

Colors are amazing and super light. I injured my ankle badly 3 years ago and the Saucony Kineta Relay is the only shoe I can wear. Thought I'd try these Sauconys because they looked like they would fit the same way. They are really very comfortable, apart from the fact that it is almost impossible for me to fit into them. The tongue is firmly bonded to the inner lining, which limits the shoe's ability to stretch while gliding. I often have to wear an elastic bandage on my leg and it's almost…

Pros
  • Hands-free operation
Cons
  • Not bad, but...