I took a new camera, from the store, everything works fine, some scared me, they say don’t take kenon, don’t take it. And what to take? Chinese Nikon? F then go bankrupt on lenses? Nope. Maybe Nikon DSLRs are good, but Kenon lenses are cheaper and better. I mean the L series of lenses. I am very pleased with the camera - you get it and don’t worry about the casters, the working ISO is 800, well, sometimes 1000, when with an external flash it’s 200-400. A good choice for photojournalists…

It was my first DSLR, with which I switched to FF, and it fully justified itself as a reportage camera for every day. The focusing system of this device is very fancy, compared to the tenth and hundredth series, as well as the affordable 5D mark II. The device is well suited for shooting sports events, moving people, animals, running children are well caught in the frame. Due to the fact that this is a crop, a larger number of inexpensive lenses are available here, allowing you to assemble the

I had to change my religion. I was a Nikonist and followed Father NIKON, but now I have become a Canonist - I will begin to live according to the CANONs)) For a long time I endured the soapiness of my Nikon d7000 . I tested it, adjusted it . last week I took it for sale, since it had already been sold on ebay for 2 months and never sold. I was going to buy a replacement for him . I watched almost the entire Nikon lineup in the budget semi-professional segment - d90, 7100, 600, 610. I shot at

The camera is very fond of low ISO, opening the aperture to the maximum, which spoils some group shots (the back row of people is blurry). The camera on full automatic would rather turn on the flash than raise the ISO above 400. The CA mode (almost automatic) helps out. There is a flash in the camera body. On the one hand - extra weight and extra money. I have an extra flash, it weighs half a kilo. As a result, even with a fix, the camera is not a camera, but a dumbbell . So I rarely take…

I have been using the camera for 2 years. During this time, there was not a single failure. Of the advantages, a good autofocus system should be noted (it catches well, and there are many points). Both photos and videos are top notch. In low light, it sometimes blurs the focus, but this largely depends on the optics (it is much more common with budget models than with Elks). Not cheap, of course, but not too expensive either. Recommended for beginners.

The device is definitely worth the money. The choice was between 60D and 7D, respectively. Everything was finally decided when I took it in my hands . As for the reviews for his poor video shooting, I say right away - nonsense. Firstly, this is not a video camera, but a camera. Secondly, even for a camera, video in HD 60fps is not bad enough. For those who have arms growing from the lumbar back, there is a "fully automatic mode" button, which of course is not ideal, but to the level of an…

I have been shooting with DSLRs for 8 years already (there were 350, 400, 500D 30, 40, 50D) - i. E. there is something to compare in a similar segment. Appeared in comparison with the past: on the one hand, it is convenient to add a focusing mode by a point with additional points around (I don’t use 19-point ones - it’s slow for reporting, and it’s not always necessary to focus on the nearest object). It often helps, but in 30-40 percent of cases, the auxiliary point "catches" the distant…

When buying a choice between five and seven. The purpose for which the device will be used was discussed with the seller beforehand. Among my tasks is shooting fast-moving objects. As an example - an air show, motorsport. For this, 1 - autofocus accuracy, 2 - "rate of fire" of continuous shooting are important. A simple test was carried out. Two 7D and 5D Mark II cameras with identical EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM lenses. The object of shooting is a bird at a distance of about 4 meters. The bird…

An excellent camera for those who know why he needs it. Of course, if you're a hobbyist who shoots static subjects 2 weeks a year on vacation, you won't notice any difference to the cheaper Canons since the 500D. In the end, you will even be disappointed. But the problem is not the cameras, but your personal one. Great item for photo hunting. Personally for myself I took it for these purposes. When I know that I will be shooting in low light conditions and I need to focus on the quality of the

I've been using for about a year. Very happy with the purchase. The design is at a height, not much different from a penny. Many people write about problems with autofocus, they probably don’t know what the adjustment of the device is)) well, then let them suffer)) Although when I took the camera and lenses for adjustment, they didn’t adjust the device for me, explaining that it was too difficult, but set up my optics under the photo ) So even at aperture 1,2 everything comes out very clearly))

I'm just horrified by this camera. What they write in the reviews is not true. I tried to shoot a report on it with 75 photos out of 500 in focus. The noise is such that it cannot be suppressed programmatically. The picture from this camera is more strongly reminiscent of film photographs of the mid-90s. Morally obsolete model with greatly inflated quality characteristics.

The price of 48100 is written here - in Hong Kong you will not find it anywhere for so much. The kit costs 80,000, the bodysuit is 15k cheaper. A crop factor of 1.6 is very positive at tele-distances. Increases the "look" distance of the telephoto lens. And at wide angles, of course, FF is very useful. Like all Canon devices, except for the 1000D and 450D, it does not tolerate soapy optics.

The camera is ideal for reportage shots where speed and focusing accuracy are most important. Perfect ergonomics allows you to work with the settings with your eyes closed. 5D MarkII is not so convenient in this regard. If compared with 5D MarkII, then these are initially technically different cameras, those who need a 35mm matrix will not look at the seven, and those who need 60 frames video will not fit 5D. If in the future they make 7D with a full-size matrix, then this will be the best…

I switched to 7D from 300D And at first I was even upset that it shoots worse on the same lenses, but gradually I figured it out and realized that the CANON EF 28-135 IS lens, which worked great on 300D, is not suitable for 7D. Therefore, I had to use Canon FIX 50 1.4 first, and then Canon EF 16-35 + Canon 70-200 2.8. And only after that the camera revealed its potential. I do not advise using non-native optics. buying tamrona 17-50 VC was a mistake - which did not allow to realize what was…

AF, AF and more AF. You can customize for every taste) Smart, accurate. It really works at illumination around EV 0 without additional illumination, the main thing is that at least something can be seen) 19 cross points. The rate of fire is squeezed out with the appropriate cards - more than sufficient. with 266x you can squeeze out 30 RAW frames in 16 seconds . a series of 30 frames, then shut up for 12 seconds. Perhaps faster cards will give a better result. only more than 80 frames in one…

I switched to seeds from 60D, I changed it to a used one with a surcharge. And I will say that the camera is very good, first of all, as a photographer’s tool, it is perceived much better than 60k, lenses began to produce a sharper picture and focus more accurately in low light conditions, with CF cards work faster than SD cards and save processing time. I think the camera will appeal to those who want to buy a reliable photo tool for themselves, this is the word that characterizes this camera.

If you have experience shooting on cameras like Canon 30D, Canon 40D, and even more so full frame - think thrice before taking a seven. Canon's crazy race for pixels led to a sad result - the picture disappeared. She lost in volume, color, depth. 18 megapixels on the crop is a clear excess. 1. The camera is extremely demanding on the correct exposure - just something goes wrong and unpleasant dirty noises creep in. 2. Due to this number of megapixels, the camera is extremely sensitive to…

I have been using it since the end of 2022. I shoot a lot on trips (only photos), the camera sometimes got it - once a bag with a camera was torn off a motorcycle on asphalt at ~ 80 km / h - baht. the block is in porridge, there is a scratch on the camera, it has been working since then for two years without problems. I dragged it through the mountains, drenched it in the rain on campaigns - all for nothing. An excellent universal device, a friend of a tourist. I compared it with the 6D, but…

was bought as a worthy device, which I switched to after 450 Kenon. I chose between Pyatdvak and 7D, there was not enough money and outweighed 7D. I was satisfied with everything, until during the shooting all the buttons stopped working and the device itself stopped working. And this is only after 8.5 thousand frames. now he is in the service, where they shook their heads and said that they would return it no earlier than a month .

Despite the fact that the seven is cropped, all L-ki fit perfectly on it. Waiting for 7D Mark II! They promise a lot there, but I think they will meet my expectations. The conclusion can be drawn as follows: 7D is a high-speed reportage camera, more technologically advanced than its cropped predecessors, I mean 50D and 60D, the seven should be compared more with top-class models, such as 6D and 5D Mark II, and in terms of rate of fire with 1D Mark IV, whatever one may say, one figure in the…