Hankook Tire DynaPro ATM RF10 275/65 R17 115T summer Review

The tread measured 11mm, feels softer than the previous Bridgestone Dueler A/T. I took a photo of all the inscriptions in a circle, maybe someone will come in handy.

Probably the only tires I would buy again. By the combination of qualities. And the only (of the tried) which, in my opinion, are suitable for year-round use. The Michelin Tour HP is also interesting, apparently they are one of the few options that can beat the RF10 in terms of noise and softness.

For their money - the option is definitely the best, Bridgestone and Goodrich go a little longer, but at a price one and a half to two times more expensive.

The main driving around the city, if not for trips to the village, would take the highway. In general, a good option for frame SUVs. well balanced, Swallows seams and pits well, before that, on the highway, the booth shook hoo. While the new aquaplaning did not feel, flew into puddles at 110, did not swim.

Excellent tires for driving on asphalt and off-road. Excellent road holding under any conditions of summer operation, winter operation is contraindicated. I take the second set. I did not dare to take tires from other manufacturers in this price range. There are better but also more expensive. Everything is acceptable for this price.

I am writing on behalf of the southern regions, Hong Kong Kalmykia (winter summer autumn spring) steppe clay sand works fine, in the summer Hong Kong Hong Kong Sevastopol serpentine mountains, everything is fine, I think it is excellent rubber for the southern regions, a neighbor on this rubber went to Hong Kong for the New Year holidays. in winter it behaves like a Velcro (up to 70 km. H the car keeps well, I don’t drive faster in winter) in summer - without jambs, the track is soft…

ATryzhka she is ATryzhka! I put it on the Duster. 225 \ 75 \ 16 - barely squeezed in! It's fine in a straight line, but in corners and on potholes I understand that I was greedy. Now I sold the kit 225 \ 75 \ 16 to a friend on a Kia Sorento, and I take the same Dunyasha for myself, but a smaller one, so as not to tear the arches and fender liner. So. In the bottom line . Rubber cool! There is no need to compare it with any other - you need to clearly set tasks for yourself, and then in front of

Disgusting tires. In general, I do not recommend. I used to have a Maxxis AT-771 on another car - it’s completely different, I recommend it to everyone: it’s very strong and has a huge wear resource. Got pros: It does not harden much in the cold down to -10, it holds the road well on a wet surface, rows well on gravel. Some cons: Very brittle rubber, constant micro punctures and damage. He collects everything that is possible: nails, screws, wire, glass, sharp fragments - the wheels are…

Everything would be fine. but the quality . One with a marriage, the second with 65g of cargo. All wheels made in Korea. Let's see how it goes! With its pros: The rubber rolls well, the ride is pleasant and not noisy (I was very afraid that it would buzz) Cons: One wheel was defective. 175gr. cargo and not the ability to balance =))))

I recommend to purchase, original production Korea. Pros below: Excellent elastic rubber AT. Auto Suzuki Jimny, after replacing the standard bridge, it became much more comfortable + passable. A real ATeshka of dual use. Got cons: There is no inscription on the sidewalls in white, current embossing.

Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 225/70 R15 tires for a Mitsubishi Pajero were what I opted for. These tires are great for an SUV, in my opinion. lasted for almost 22k miles, has great traction on rainy roads, and is very steady when turning. Even though they create a tiny bit of noise when moving, on a busy highway you won't even hear them. It's fun to ride one, and they barely make a sound on Hong Kong's newly paved roads. The tires perform admirably across the board.

I got it for Pradik because I believe it has the best tread for a vehicle of that kind, which is important if you ever venture off the beaten path. I am going to describe how the mud acts while it is on the road because I have not yet climbed into it. Being soft, it is able to absorb the bumps in the road. Almost no noise. Normal stopping distances apply when riding on dry pavement; I haven't tried it in the wet yet. The road is standard for speeds up to 150 miles per hour. The track on the…

Replaced BF Goodrich AT with them the previous year. I was looking for something less loud and harsh. Of course, Dina's dirt kneads worse, though not by much. On the track, however, things are lot more solid and forgiving. When I first rode Dina in a snowstorm before the season change, I couldn't have been more impressed with the way she handled the snow and the slick road.

Certainly not MT however. However, after putting on the stock tires, it just kicks! There has never been a moment when I questioned my decision. On the highway 140–150 miles per hour as on the highway, and you can exit the highway without any issues. If you give it revolutions to throw dirt out of the tread, it will jam with viscous clay, but it will creep along very slowly. Weights ranging from 10 to 30 grams were required for balancing, yet only 80 were trapped on one wheel.

Highlander by Toyota. Size standard 245/55-R19. It can be challenging to find anything suitable in this size for a fair price. DynaPro appeared appropriate in two ways: - cost (41 for four wheels) Combat protector: what you need to move off the road onto grass, sand, or a muddy rural road for a crossover without obstructing. By use: regular balance (maximum load 35g) Soft: Minor asphalt cracks are barely heard when moving at a high speed. Track is unconcerned. The amount of noise you can hear…

With its advantages, which include ride comfort and the ability to perform well in cross-country terrain (even on clay; the Toyo AT cannot be compared), it appears to be rather aggressive. Due to the fact that comfort is obtained through softness, one must exercise caution when navigating impediments such as rails that forcefully project outward.

Purchased in the greatest diameter possible for my vehicle, which is 225/70R16. I positioned it immediately following the winter Michelin X-ICE North 235 / 65R16. I immediately felt that the car raised substantially and began to steer poorly, but this was something I expected to feel because it overcomes asphalt ruts noticeably worse, seemingly hanging to the side lugs. In overall, I am quite happy with the purchase; however, I had my heart set on getting a conti atesh one, but unfortunately…

Excellent tires, somewhere they write summer, somewhere all-weather. So, on the Chevy Niva, both in winter and summer, without taking off, I passed 102 t. Km. of course, it got worn out at the end, until one left for a shot, 5 people + cargo. I bought the same set and we go further. In winter, it works like Velcro, because it is soft. During the run, only one puncture was repaired, the tread is high, powerful. Suspension helps a lot that soft. Immediately 40 km. H on the curb, tram rails, pits,

Auto Freelander 2, stock 235/60-18 The rubber is soft, good on light off-road, copes well with bad roads. Balanced perfectly from 5 to 20g - a great result for a 28kg wheel assembly. This is where the pluses end. Wild howl from 70 to 110 km/h. Then quietly. On any asphalt surface. As I heard, I went to check the bearings and the gearbox, but no - the tires. The brakes and grip are much worse than the highway - you won't be able to drive. Swimming in the heat. They began to crack, clear signs of

After the "elevator" the task was to buy tires for the city, but also that it would not be scary to move off the road. I chose for a long time, as a result, in a non-standard size (255 / 70R18) I found this one. Bought and did not regret. Who chooses it or BFG, think many times, the price of the latter is sometimes twice as high. The balance is terrible (150-200g). Yes, on the BFG you will go 100tkm, but on this one 80. But if therut with clay often falls out, the BFG will be better, the side…