Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 77
  • 5
    56
  • 4
    15
  • 3
    4
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Quality is top notch, happy with everything.

First impression - she's on her way! I calmly drive into the sandy hills that I was afraid to look at on the regular Conti. Very decent climbing on the rocks. It rides on a dirty track, but not of course MT. For Duster on the elevator +3 size is just what you need. The front left locker is slightly polished due to a sagging spring. (But this is fixable with a hair dryer.)

Pros
  • She's driving!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

June 2022. So far I have driven about five thousand. I don’t know what they have with all-season, but as summer tires, they are just perfect tires for SUVs. After the suddenly deceased summer Kontiks, I rest on these hankooks in every sense on the road. They are not heard at all. They go very smoothly. The track simply ceased to exist. Hydroplaning is present, but seen at much higher speeds than on highway continentals. Despite the fact that they were balanced strangely (the run-up of the…

Pros
  • Soft Quiet Track? No, have not heard. "Pop up" much later than the true highway
Cons
  • gets dirty quickly

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

I was looking for a decent tire for my Grand Cherokee wj, read a lot of reviews, went over the Internet. Whether to take her, or Boris Fedorovich. But I decided to start with Hankook. Happy with the purchase, the car rows as expected. Maybe there is something better in this price category, I don’t know, I have nothing to compare with, this is my first SUV and such tires. Would I recommend her, yes rather than no. I also like the appearance in it, for the aggressiveness of the pattern and for…

Pros
  • Tread, wear resistance, good grip, allows etching up to 1 (maybe more, did not check) Road handling compare to conventional highway
Cons
  • What you can hardly find in Belarus, only on order

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, I'm glad I chose this option.

I use it on Nissan NP300, stock size: 255/70-16. Drove about 50 thousand, wear - 50%. Operation: 80% asphalt, the rest is a grader. They hold the road well, the rutting of the coating is not noticeable, there is no aquaplaning. With wear, of course, the properties of rubber begin to be lost, but that is what wear is. For example, recently, twice, with an interval of a week, I pierced the same wheel. There were no more punctures for all the time. In the mud (silt on the river bank in early May)

Pros
  • - price - wear resistance - patency - not noisy - comfort on the road - well balanced - appearance
Cons
  • Yes, somehow I did not find any shortcomings. Maybe a little soft

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

It stands on a short field. On the primer I etch up to 1.5 atm - it goes softly and smoothly. On the highway: 2-2.2 atm, does not leave a rut, there is no noise, the roll is good. In the mud - an honest average, but IMHO on clay it's worse to get stuck. A wet road is good, a turn on wet pavement with clay after a KAMAZ truck from the side of the road is winding, but it is easy to catch, after ten or so the sky and the earth are stuck. Price / quality IMHO on the top five.

Pros
  • Quiet, good rolling, moderately soft, the track is almost not felt.
Cons
  • Soft, as a result - wear.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

To begin with, I take the second set of this rubber. The difference is only in size. If the first one was 245/75, then the new one is 265/70. So the first one served 7 years and the mileage was 90 thousand. In my opinion, the wheels have worn out more from service life than from mileage. Replaced due to the discovery of a metal cord that had begun to climb and a hernia that appeared. Rubber operated all year round, hard . In the Crimea, he climbed along the rocky paths to the White Rock and the

Pros
  • In the summer it does not "float", in the winter it does not harden. Rut flooded with water +, Dry or wet sand + Light swamp + Durable and wear resistant. Details in the comments.
Cons
  • Not eternal)) In clay it "washes out", that is, it is designed for light off-road. For example, you don’t get bogged down in a damp meadow, although it doesn’t really go uphill on damp grass without a limber.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

Hello, doubting the purchase of this tire model. I bought it as a summer tire and don't take the all-season tires seriously. Tires larger than regular 44mm! Look at the car decently. I wanted to find when buying a balance of appearance, driving on asphalt and light and medium off-road. 85 percent drive on asphalt. It drives snbya surprisingly quietly, not at all louder than Dunlop Velcro. Off-road, on wet grass, a specialist drove only on a rear-wheel drive to the middle hill, and lo and…

Pros
  • Quiet compared to Velcro. Looks beautiful and decorates my jeep. On asphalt it brakes well. Moves on the rear wheel drive perfectly. On the grass rides great even on the back of the hill. Doesn't fall into a rut. It rides through the dirt to the wheel floor! What surprises me the most is that she goes exactly where you direct the car, like on rails.
Cons
  • No white lettering

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Valuable purchase, nothing but pluses!

Pros: Ride comfort, cross-country ability (even on clay - Toyo also AT cannot be compared), it looks moderately aggressive. With its cons: Comfort is achieved by softness - one must be careful when passing obstacles a la strongly protruding rails.

Car Mercedes ML 320. Previously were: Toyo Open Country All-Terrain, Bridgestone Blizzak DM-Z3, BF G AT. All of them have their pros and cons. But such a generalist is probably not to be found. Fuel consumption on the level. Put 245 * 70 R16. At a pressure of 0.8 atm, it rides over stones, logs, etc. it's like a fairytale. If they told me about these wheels like I did, I would not believe it! On the sidewall they have the following designations: sun, rain, snow, highway, off-road, MS, Extra…

Pros
  • Looks good. One side has white lettering. Who understands in mud tires - will understand with a visual inspection. There is everything - lugs, sides, etc. Excellent rubber quality. Checked! There is no noise, no aquaplaning!, self-cleaning at a height, comfort can be envied on a rocky mountain primer. Tested on a rock, swamp, gravel and sand (beach) wet and dry. Everywhere is great.
Cons
  • long thought which side to put. White lettering or black, outside. No more! Haven't tested in the winter though.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Expectations were not met, average quality.

I took BIG O in return (there was no finance, now I regret it). In dry weather, it works perfectly - both sand and gravel and a rocky ridge, but after rain in the fields without grass, you dance even at full drive, I think you can forget about clay - now even where I previously drove along the slope along the river I can’t dare to repeat route - slides and slides down like on skis. One incident was already on the road to nature - she simply slid sideways and leaned against a neighboring car…

Pros
  • price, lack of aquaplaning, soft and not noisy, beautiful for the city and for the countryside in dry weather
Cons
  • on off-road it is washed out instantly, if there is a rut in the mud - you will never get out, the braking distance is noisy and slightly increased

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product at a good price, I advise you to try it.

Faithfully, 9 years and about 100 thousand mileage have passed on the Prado 120. The tire is not bad, but there is no piggy delight either. Were written off because of the cord that got out of the tire and hernias on three wheels (overloaded). Pros: Reliable, high-quality tire, well balanced, no unpleasant surprises for 9 years. I bought it on the Prado 120, about 100 thousand mileage passed. On the track on a solid four, while new, everything is fine, as the wear and tear, the discomfort…

Good all-round tire, and it's not scary to drive and move out on the highway. I can only compare with the summer Nankang 245/60/18. I won't say anything good about that. Only beautiful, but on the highway the car had to be caught on a rut all the time. Hancock holds the track confidently. After the riding season, I bought the same, but the winter version with spikes. Also great. This winter, like a cow on ice, but this is understandable.

Pros
  • 1. UAZ Patriot does not float along the track on a rut! 2. Durable. Not a single injury in two seasons. 3. Rows well in the mud. Never stuck on a stock patriot. 4. No noise (maybe good Shumka)))) 5. Not very hard.
Cons
  • 1. Too heavy and it is felt. 2. Expensive, but not much. 3. No longer for sale.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Quality is top notch, happy with everything.

Here are my amateurish impressions. Never been whimsical to rubber. Somehow I went almost on slicks, until the cord appeared. Therefore, there is nothing to compare with. I use Jeep Liberty/Cherokee. Off roads. I haven’t been in fierce mud, but it rows normally through puddles and ruts, until it sat on its belly, we drove. They say that they quickly blur, xs, I didn’t notice much, I repeat, I don’t poke my head into swamps, I didn’t roll on clay. They also paddle very well in the sand.…

Pros
  • Price. yes, and everything else. Beautiful protector =D
Cons
  • For a long time they could not put on a disk on a tavern, but this is more likely due to the fact that in the warehouse they were stacked on top of each other

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No complaints, I recommend to buy.

I bought it for Pradik (in my opinion, the optimal tread for such a car, if you sometimes drive off the road). I have not climbed into the mud yet, I will describe how it behaves on the road. Soft, swallows bumps in the road. Almost no noise. On dry pavement, it slows down normally (I haven’t ridden in the rain yet). Road at speeds up to 150 holds normally. The track on the road is felt, but not so much that the steering wheel would be held and constantly taxied. But when the asphalt starts to…

Pros
  • Not noisy, swallows bumps in the road, the rut on the road is not felt much. Not heavy. Non-directional - you can put a white inscription both outside and inside. For asphalt / light off-road tread - an adequate price.
Cons
  • On bad pavement, the car starts to rock, you can feel the roll. If you travel often and far, this is a significant drawback. Thin side.

Dimension 255/55/19. Year-round operation in the Hong Kong region on Land Rover Discovery 3 (permanent four-wheel drive). The previous slipper-soft and quiet Michelin Syhchrone road bike came from the factory, has been out of production for 2 years. When trying to poke a semblance of off-road, I tore the sides of the wheels 2 times, then there were difficulties in finding rare wheels. Therefore, I decided to take something off-road, more versatile (off-road highway) and more common. A / T tires

Pros
  • Versatility (for roads and moderate off-road), moderate price, reinforced but soft sidewall - can be etched on soft soils, disc protection, cross-country ability on sand and snow, absolutely indifferent to the rut of the road, durable and tenacious.
Cons
  • Noisier and harder than a branded highway (not critical), insufficient patency in mud and clay, after all, A / T, not M / T, insufficient lateral grip on slippery surfaces - slips into a rut when driving across the slope

Revainrating 5 out of 5

An ideal product for any type of consumer.

Very happy with the wheels. I bought a car (pajerik-sport of the first generation) for completely dead ones, and for the bargained amount I ordered and installed these (265/75, 16 ") the next day. I have been driving for 2.5 years. What they have not seen during this time. And 140 -150 on a toll road, and more or less moderate dirt, and primers / grader roads, and asphalt, and deep snow to the very top of the wheel (from which it turned out to be quite normal), and many, many sidewall scuffs on

Pros
  • 1. Good tenacity - rarely skids in moderate mud. Allows you to climb fairly serious slopes. 2. Really all-weather - in winter I rarely leave the city, snow, snow "porridge" - they are generally invisible, it rides as if they were not there. Once I got out in the snow knee-deep. 3. Exceptional wear resistance - I have been driving them for more than two years, I replaced them immediately after buying a car. I still can’t understand if the tread has worn off at least a little or not.
Cons
  • The only thing that these wheels are not subject to is bare ice and rolled snow (also to the state of ice). There will be skids and slips. But you need to understand that this is not a spike. So that's kind of a disadvantage.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

Installed on L200 instead of stock Bridgestone Dueler. On asphalt: compared to the old highway, they are noisier, sometimes they hum at a speed of 80 km / h. Fuel consumption remained at the same level, but comfort has increased, it eats up small irregularities perfectly. Handling and grip are good. On wet pavement: good grip, but handling when driving only on rear-wheel drive is not very good, especially in puddles, worse than on highways. Solved by connecting all-wheel drive. In the mud…

Pros
  • Versatility, suitable for any coatings. Does well in the off season. Adequate price, good balance, excellent appearance
Cons
  • Movement on wet clay. There are no other critical flaws.

I took tires Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 225/70 R15 for Mitsubishi Pajero. In my opinion, excellent tires for an SUV. Withstood more than 22,000 kilometers, excellent grip in the rain, on wet roads, stable in corners. They make a little noise when driving, but this is completely unnoticeable on a busy highway, and does not bring any particular inconvenience. Riding them is a pleasure, on smooth asphalt (although this is a rarity in Hong Kong now) they just flutter) In general, the tires are…

Pros
  • Price, durability, quality
Cons
  • A little noisy