Review on COS by Sanjar Meredow
I think it’s a project to look forward to.
The plan began to make exchange proposals. From the first day, its number has reached 15,000 users. However, according to information currently available, it is in a state of disrepair.
When I visited the website of the plan, I came across a screen of a market that had not been developed for a long time. However, I do not believe that it is actually harmful. Plan a website, i.e. there is no information about the creators and their offers in one market.
By 2020, the news will still be posted on social media. I was very worried when I read the user’s comments about the plan. Because most of the user comments look bad.
However, the COSS exchange is a very good exchange and I believe that it should actually be supported by a COS exchange. Besides, I have never traded with COS, but if you want to trade with it, you can do a little research to find out which exchange it supports.
In short, if you have 1% of COSS payments on your application, you will receive half of the transaction fees earned by one COSS exchange per week. Revenues depend on the size of the platform. The more you do, the more you practice. In addition, unlike other platforms that offer similar labels for COSS, we must point out that the unique features of the cosmos ecosystem for label owners will be formalized 50% each time.
Pros
- Mature entrepreneurs who listen to the demands of society.
Cons
- a project that rarely occurs on any exchange list.
- The website is low.
- The creators remain unknown.
