Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
José A Rodríguez photo
Valencia, Venezuela
4 Level
1087 Review
776 Karma

Review on Cream Finance by José A Rodríguez

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Still in a Beta Development Without New Updates for the system

Cream is a blockchain project that although is still available and possible to check, it is not providing anything valuable to the crypto-world. This project is just in a beta version that has been extended for months since the last update of the company. That version it has affects the possibilities of the company of achieving good community support. Not so many people follow this project, and on the external market, there have been just superficial discussions about it.

The interface of the project reveals the sense of being programmed to receive tokens and offer a way of storing them. There is a connection to some Erc-20 wallets. The first task of this platform is to provide a channel for lenders where they instead of exchanging tokens, can increase the volume by leading them with some mid-term fees. Besides, the network also provides options for withdrawals and swaps. In fact, this is one of the revealing facts of the coming alpha version, where users who work with mining pools will have the chance of mining some blocks on it.

The design of it is simple. It was developed with a funny idea that does not look good for what is expected to be. I think that also because of this, it hasn't received good feedback from users and crypto-believers.

So, in conclusion. This blockchain has a long and undefined path to reach before being considered a reliable project. If it keeps available on the internet, the company should update and release a responsible roadmap where to check their plans and goals.



Pros
  • It is a blockchain with options for lenders that is supported by swaps and integrations into mining pools.
Cons
  • It is small and with low content. It has undefined purposes and it is difficult to follow the development of the team since they haven't posted anything new yet.
  • It is in a beta version. It has kept that status for a long time.
  • It does not have a real financial history. Users have not worked on this platform.
  • The design is outdated and simple. It cannot be considered a standard interface, since it is strange.