Pros
- nice
Cons
- nice
Pros
- Zero / No transactions fees
Cons
- Move to their Mainnet was kind of stressfull to me. An experience I didn't like much
Pros
- EOS enables the developers to build decentralized applications. These can be built in the public environment.Moreover, when you look at the platform itself, you will realize its scalability as well. It is easier for the companies to use this platform in order to create various applications. With the help of parallel execution, it becomes easy for the company to run multiple decentralized applications.Since many of the enterprises, companies and developers are looking for such a decentralized blockchain-based platform, the future looks bright.
Cons
- There are several platforms in various stages of development that aim to offer scalable dapps. The value of the EOS token will be closely linked to the level of adoption the EOS platform can achieve.
Pros
- Ethereum and bitcoin use the proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism to verify transactions. As a result, all miners need to validate a new transaction before it can be added to the ledger. This mechanism often results in the slowing down of the network and an increase in the time taken to process news transactions. In 2014, however, Dan Larimer pioneered the Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism as a solution to this problem.
Cons
- Miners transaction fees
Pros
- EOS is a Larimer project. Lots you can say about him, but what you can't say after his inventing DPoS and writing BitShares and Steemit is that he doesn't produce. AngelShares had the exact same terms as EOS, and it paid out as promised. Graphene, the implementation of DPoS they plan to use for EoS works and has been tested in BitShares for years now. It's just a matter of implementing smart contract functionality, plus the other extras mentioned, on top of it. It's not the greatest solution, but goddamnit it will scale if nothing else will.
Cons
- EOS seems shady, irresponsible, and extremely dangerous to the crypto ecosystem. I know there is tons of promise around the EOS project and it has a strong team, but I can't help but question their decision to structure their ICO the way that they did.
Pros
- Such projects very often turn out to be very successful. They don't focus on any service in particular, but offer a base for new projects to be built on. EOS wants to develop "the most powerful infrastructure for decentralized applications". Their whitepapers explain the technical aspect in every detail, but the main features would be scalability for almost endless dapps and flexibility with usability thanks to the EOS tools and a web toolkit for app developers. They offer a very solid base, however the success relies on whether or not developers will want to use this project for their dapps. There are other strong alternatives on the market, so the competition may be tough. It's essential to research the project with the focus on the technical analysis of offered tools and compare it to other dapp-related projects.
Cons
- Good project, and a professional team working with their community by keeping them up-to-date. Nice response time after contacting them. For me a succesful ICO is not only depending on the idea but also on the effort. Having a nice and well designed website, a detail written whitepaper is an important thing, but the key for success is effort and in case of EOS you can see their effort in their github code. EOS is on my list and I believe in their project...even though their project already can be called a succesful one.
Pros
- EOS is a platform that will allow developers to build and develop decentralized applications. For example, organizations that want to produce blockchain solutions for managing their supply chains can do so by building a solution on top of the EOS platform. This organization can gain access to the features of a blockchain network without having to build one themselves. EOS is similar to Ethereum and Lisk in this way. However, the EOS platform possesses features that differentiate it from projects that already exist.
Cons
- EOS is an intriguing project. It offers solutions to the usability and scaling issues that projects like Ethereum are facing at the moment. The vision of the team seems clear and organized. The team itself is made up of high quality individuals. The project’s Github page is active and it’s obvious that progress is being made as we move closer to the platform’s launch. The project has also put itself in a good position from a partnership perspective.
Pros
- The EOS blockchain is part of a paradigm shift in designing scalable, user-friendly but still secure blockchain platforms. Its key selling point is the millions of transactions it can handle per second. At 1 million transactions per second, it can support corporations and enterprises. Existing public blockchain platforms have run into hurdles that require a rethink of how to construct a blockchain.
Cons
- EOS is built with prior experience from building Steemit and Bitshares since 2013. Steemit is a user-friendly content platform that runs on a blockchain and charges zero fees. Bitshares is a decentralized exchange processing 800,000 transactions per day, more than Bitcoin and Ethereum combined. The technology and lessons learned from both projects have informed the design of EOS.
Pros
- EOS is noted to be a slightly controversial project due to its questionable execution, one could be fair to state that with a 4 billion dollar budget, and a stellar team with credible experience within distributed ledger technology, the cumulative vision of EOSIO’s Community and key team are more than enough to make this one of the few perennial protocols of our time.
Cons
- Instead of checking the state of the network at a given time, the nodes check the series of events that have occurred so far to track the state of the network. The result is a system that takes longer to completely reconfirm the transaction history at restart, but that can handle a much higher bitrate of running transactions.
Pros
- Home of Dapps! Ethereum killer
Cons
- Transaction confirmation times needs serious consideration and work
Pros
- They are really experienced with how supportive they respond to requests
Cons
- They should improve user experience on mobile wallet apps to make users to have a easier understanding.
Pros
- So many pros. They are the future for dapps
Cons
- The fact that only a few wallets hold a great % of tokens os worrying
Pros
- Blockchain all in one place
Cons
- Slight block issues and delays
Pros
- 2nd Best DAPP
Cons
- Many confirmation blocks
Pros
- Nice One !!
Cons
- Nice One !!
Pros
- very realible
Cons
- coin i think will be going up in future
Pros
- Very reliable
Cons
- I don't think they have much cons, but I feel they should look more at what Eth achieved in order to better their product
Pros
- EOS is growing rapidly and has scability and is actually made for the mainstream to handle vast volumes from being adopted by mainstream.
Cons
- Though EOS is made for the mainstream, its not largely adopted by mainstream. Large business still needs lots of encouragement to adopt EOS
Pros
- The platform's objective is to provide decentralized hosting of applications, intelligent contractual capabilities and decentralized storage of corporate solutions that address problems such as the scalability of blocks in Bitcoin and Ethereum, as well as the elimination of all charges to users. EOSIO accomplishes this with multiple threads (it can work in multiple computer cores) as well as with delegated evidence of participation in its consensus protocol
Cons
- The project was able to raise $4b without a single project but some words coined together called white paper and just recently released it's first product. I find it really weird how easy it was to raise such money which only makes it more centralized .
Pros
- superb powerful infrastructure coins, flexible, easy use,and high value.
Cons
- need more improve for team and the mainnet
