Review on UTEMIS by gregori cordova
a great idea, but with unprofessional developers
As we already know, the American continent has one of the most unstable and unequal economies on the planet. Despite the great natural wealth, the resources are not well used. Whether due to mismanagement, or due to the hegemony of the banks, Latin Americans feel that their money is worth nothing, and every day the situation is worse. To end this problem, the Utemis project was created specifically to contribute to the business development of the continent and end years of instability, through an electronic commerce platform in which its native token called UTS would be used. In this platform, companies would be connected directly with suppliers from all over the world and thus end the managers, who are left with a large percentage each time the entrepreneurs carry out a transaction. In this way, they would make the region an economic power like never before, taking advantage of the possibilities offered by the blockchain.
The idea of the project seemed great, but it failed to attract much attention, due to a lot of mistrust. They did not have a professional website to find information about the project; Nor was there a number of followers on social networks; On their twitter account they said that by trading with their UTS token, they would have huge profits, and with extremely low commissions when trading, something that is proven is synonymous with a possible scam. They wanted to do an ICO to raise enough money to carry out the project, but it was a total failure, since they did not even do good marketing campaigns
Today it is on the list of dead coins, since they did not succeed in trying to enter the cryptocurrency market.
Pros
- They had an idea that they could have successfully developed if it were run by professionals
Cons
- A project about which there is not much information, and it is not known who its creators are
- They took advantage of the continent's popular discontent with their national currencies to offer a solution that they were unable to deliver.
- Their social networks are full of data that is not true just to attract attention
- Although it is considered as a dead cryptocurrency, it is still listed on a low-reputation exchange, but it has no movement or liquidity
- Her website is closed as well as her inactive social networks for many months
