If you are going to buy - think 10 times. The lens is good, but focused on the very specific needs of 0.001% of photographers - you need to clearly understand why you need it. I am an architect and architect. photographer, but even I didnβt buy it - I rented itcommplete with Kenon 5 MK2 for acomuple of shoots. In general, I am a Nikonist to the marrow of my bones, but this lens shook my religious beliefs. It is worth recognizing that at the current moment for small-format arch. photographs, Canon optics are more suitable (namely optics, not cameras. It would be glass - yes, screw it to the 800, eh) - firstly, due to the fact that sabzhe glass is slightly better than Nikon PC-E 24 mm f / 3.5, and secondly, kenon also has a unique TS-E 17 mm, which so far has no analogues at all. Nevertheless, I would not buy such a specific lens for SUCH money. It is not entirely clear to whom it is addressed. Those who use perspectivecomrrection super professionally in their work, shooting architecture for publishing houses and subject matter for advertising, use large format. No one will definitely use a nickel + a set of ts-e optics for this. Cardancomsts about the same, and in terms of detail, plasticity and airiness, the scan from it makes the picture of small-format cameras to smithereens. Otherwise, if you do not go into these lengthy arguments, for its small format the lens is excellent, if not the best. Some examples of pictures in my album: ? p=0 (from editing - onlycomlor and exposurecommpensation, did not touch the geometry)
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Lens - Fixed Black (6310B002) for US Cameras
76 Review
Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
78 Review
π· Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review
Nikon 35mm f/1.8G Auto Focus Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras - Black (Model 2183)
125 Review