Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Danish Danish ᠌ photo
From Singapore
1 Level
127 Review
209 Karma

Review on Nikon D3300 24.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with Auto Focus-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR II Zoom Lens (Black) by Danish Danish ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Full compliance with the manufacturer's assurances, high quality.

The device ended up being quite effective in its intended purpose. After spending three weeks researching various options on English-language photography websites, I finally settled on a camera to purchase. I examined the level of detail captured by several mirror and mirrorless cameras and compared it pixel by pixel in the original images. If you want the best photo quality for the least amount of money, you won't find a better camera than this one (if you disagree, send me an email). Live view and the inability to track focus are not sufficient to make a DSLR a suitable replacement for a video camera for you, but these features are of secondary importance in DSLRs. In reference to the metering of exposure. It is slightly better in the D5300, but not by a significant margin. In and of itself, this is not a deal breaker. One gets the impression that the camera does not have a wide enough dynamic range. By the way, this is the issue that plagues the majority of cameras. The screen is not touchable in any way. It is true that adding a touch screen would raise the cost of the camera and make it slightly less reliable due to the fact that it would be used in a wider range of temperatures and environments. But from the perspective of the year 2022, everything appears archaic. Indeed, and progressing through the menu by pressing buttons is not only exceedingly cumbersome but also quite difficult to get used to. You also need to climb since a DSLR in and of itself typically allows for shooting to be done not on the machine but rather in a variety of modes and with a wide range of settings. Agreed, and using the touch screen to designate where the attention should be placed is not a bad idea. When filming in the evening, it has a terrible time focusing on things that are dark. Frequently, even worse than a smartphone from the year 2022! You may observe that the focus in this picture is not quite perfect if you examine it pixel by pixel (while maintaining the aspect ratio of 100 percent). It is not a negative aspect at all; in fact, this feature may even be found in higher-priced cameras manufactured by Nikon and Canon. But, things are significantly improved in Sony's mirrorless cameras. However in this case, it most likely isn't the camera itself but rather the lens. And at the price of six, a whale's want is not worth any more. He is quite talented. But, the identical Sony cameras up to 60 render the photo substantially worse than the one taken with the d3300 already at an iso of over 400. The reason for this is because Sony's noise reduction is quite severe, and as a result, it overwrites the finer features in the image. The human skin, for instance, appears to be that of a mannequin in such photos. Nikon does not have such issues. Even now, in the year 2022, I would recommend making a purchase.

Pros
  • The quality of the photo. It is the same as it was on earlier models of cameras, up to the d7200, in this camera. When all is said and done, the matrix and the processor are the same thing. The photo quality is noticeably better than that of the vast majority of competitors up to 50k ISO. Even when shooting at night or with a high ISO. Cost for a photograph of this quality. Excellent quality of the video. Even when the lighting is dim, Honest 60fps can write, however it cannot do so at night. While this is happening, the sound is being recorded normally, but in a single channel. Size that is compact (for DSLR) A nice screen with good clarity and brightness. The sun makes it possible to see. The image does not degrade when seen from different angles. A quality lens that is included in a kit and comes with a stabilizer. Superb assembly, with no backlash or creaks to be heard, along with a sense that the gadget is both substantial and powerful. despite the fact that this seems to be a feature shared by the majority of DSLRs. When it comes to the battery, you should have no trouble extracting approximately 1000 frames from a single charge (hello, mirrorless cameras with their 240-350 frame capacities!).
Cons
  • The metering of the exposure is not totally evident in this instance. It is common practice to reduce the amount of highlight and increase the amount of shadow. As a result, I strongly suggest shooting in NEF (RAW). There is no recording in 4K available. And iron appears to be the material that makes this possible. Now, this is relevant, considering that even a smartphone that costs ten dollars can accomplish it, but a DSLR camera that costs twenty-five dollars cannot! When filming video, there is no tracking focus. You are able to utilize this single-lens reflex camera (SLR) as a video camera; but, manual focus will be required for the majority of your footage. The amount of diopter adjustment available in the viewfinder is really limited here. But you can buy a lens. There is not an in-built remapping of dead and heated pixels like there is in Canon cameras! There is no high dynamic range (HDR), however for a completely different cost, you can have the d5300. There is no screen that folds out, thus when shooting macro, something low (like bugs or flowers), or something high (like above people's heads at a concert), it is quite inadequate. But, it is also present in the d5300. The screen is not touchable.