Review on 🏃 Asics Men's Aptitude 2 Running Pants by Sean Young

Ignore background I'm 5ft 11in, 185lbs and Medium suits me. My suit size is 40R. I was looking for cold weather running tights. and really didn't want to wear the more common skinny tights, I would just wear them under other pants that look better on 40's and get too restrictive with all the layers. There were soccer shoes that sat between baggy sweatpants and tights. Call them loose tights, Boston jogging pants, or soccer shoes. don't go outside, I'm not a soldier in the cold) and also I would like to wear only shorts. I also really didn't want anything that I had to wear but could wear alone without feeling "open". Also note that I understand that they sweat a lot when running and a fabric that dries/wicks well and doesn't clump or rub when wet is very important. Since I couldn't decide on one, I decided to buy all 3 since running is relatively affordable compared to other sports and I could spend anywhere from $125-$150 in total. The pants I bought were in order from cheapest to most expensive: - these RonHill Classic GTs (about $25 including shipping) - Asics Men's Aptitude 2 (about 50 but can also be seen for 35) <- -- Gore is considered here Running Wear Men's Essential Loose Tights (about 75 but can also be seen for 50) I know you may think I'm overdoing it with 3 pairs but everyone who runs deserves it, to spend on equipment. Running is the cheapest sport in my opinion and there's nothing wrong with great shoes and comfortable gear. I'll compare and contrast these pants a bit with Ron Hill and Gore running pants, but in the end each is a worthy choice for their features. own. Out of the 3, I liked these Asics the least, but I still gave it an "Is OK" rating, which equals a 3-star rating. If they were cheaper I would add a star. Highest rating of 3 pants: 5 stars. After a few months of use they have become my biggest attraction and I've just ordered another pair to stash in case the current ones ever die. I checked the 4 star rating I used for the Gore pants here on Revain as well. By far the most expensive but the fabric is excellent. About the Asics Aptitude 2. How they fit: In case you missed the backstory: I have a 40R suit, I'm 5ft 11" and 185lbs. First two things I noticed when wearing these Compared to Gore and Ronhill the cut is a bit odd. The waist is higher and there is more room in the crotch area. To be honest I had to tighten them a bit which left too much fabric in lumps which wasn't the most comfortable feeling. I also noticed that the belt isn't as flat and unobtrusive as the Gore and Ronhill. You could see a noticeable Band feel at the waist (which can be tightened with laces) What I appreciate most are the hand pockets they're sewn into: not deep enough to stash anything like keys while running, but with enough fabric to allow for it rain or sweat won't get wet, you're dealing with 4 layers (underwear, pocket top, pocket bottom and pant outer) made of fabric that stops beating very quickly. Also not sure what to do with open pockets that can't mistake anything for running pants on either side? I got back from a 6 mile run about 2.5 hours ago and I still haven't changed and my pants are still wet at the waist. stripe and pocket area. Ronhills and Mountains would be dry within an hour. Another thing I noticed about the fit is that they are slimmer in the calves and roomy in the hips. Too much MC Hammer for my taste. The thighs feel good, but I think the calves could have been a little more relaxed. Finally, the ankle zips are quite large and handy if you want to take off your pants and keep your shoes on. The only thing I can't imagine wearing them over regular tights is that the calf area becomes too much and the waist area with pockets would really have too much room. Therefore, the question arises: why flashes if there is no base layer underneath. Fit well, the zippers don't come loose when walking so no problem. Fabric Feel: The fabric is very soft and stretchy. This is the thinnest of the three pants, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Gore seems to be the fattest and Ronhill is in between. There is a prominent seam where the front and back halves of the pants are sewn together. Maybe they should have put reflective piping or something there instead of leaving it that way. Or flat seams would be better than those that you can't feel. It doesn't really bother running, but I can imagine that over distances longer than 10 miles this can become a friction point. I also think that with trousers in this price range they must have been sensitive to such details. Moisture wicking is good except in areas where the fabric is layered, such as B. in the pocket area, on the hip belt and on the ankle straps. There they absorb more slowly and dry more slowly compared to my other brands. They are both water-repellent, only absorb moisture. How They're Designed and Built: As I said in the fit section, I don't think the designers really thought through all the details. . I'm usually a big fan of Asics and have used them for shoes and tops. The fact that they did not build a key pocket there, but had two inner flaps for handbags without a zipper. The fact is that the belt is not a flat braid with seams, but something more noticeable. The way the sides are sewn together and the oddly large waist (high), slouchy hips and much narrower calves give me the impression that this was a more conventional shoe called running tights. To be honest, they remind me the most of my Adidas. Condivo sneakers when it comes to fit. The pant also has, just a small note, the Asics logo in the form of one of those stickers that wear off after a few washes, whereas the MUCH cheaper Ronhill pant, for example, has an embroidered logo. considering I'm not dissatisfied with pants. But I'm not ready to say I like them either, as the much cheaper Ronhill models outperform them in terms of fit, fabric quality and performance, and most importantly overall design and comfort. They're just so much better. I'm an Asics fan but I think they need to reconsider their features and/or price. I wouldn't call them specifically designed for running after everything I've written above. Pros: Lightweight, stretchy, moisture-wicking fabric for use in warmer weather compared to some other brands. Ankle zips for when you want to take off your pants and put on your shoes. Since the area between the thighs and the navel is relatively wide, running pants can be worn underneath. This. If your run started in cold weather and you've warmed up, you could take them off, leave your shoes on, and continue in shorts. Don't want to hold her. Disadvantages: - Pockets are uncomfortable from my point of view - Multi-layered areas where several layers of fabric meet remain wet for too long - No pocket for keys - Waistband is too thick and noticeable - No flat seams that can lead to washable scratches. I know it's silly but you pay a little for a brand name so they have to build it in so it lasts and looks good for the price. Final verdict: I would choose Ronhil if I had the budget. If it wasn't for the budget I would add a little and go for loose fit gore pants.