Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Sakowski ᠌ photo
1 Level
337 Review
0 Karma

Review on Renewed Samsung Galaxy Note 10 with 256GB Storage in Aura White for AT&T Customers by Wiktor Sakowski ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

Samsung decided to save us from Buridan's donkey syndrome: so as not to suffer with the choice between three screen resolutions - which is better, 2k, or the battery to live longer? phone s 9+ from it either a camera, or you opened a tube, or public services). there is no need, there is no more choice. The scholastic of the 14th century Buridan, who passionately denounced, in the spirit of that time, all freedom, especially will and choice, and presented, to prove its absolute uselessness and harmfulness, the famous image of a donkey who could not choose between two equal heaps of oats and died from hunger, I would be very pleased with this model! Now, of course, the century is different and the freedom that was feared has become a reality in advanced countries, however, the idea of ​​​​reducing functions in quantity to improve the quality of the remaining just today it is very relevant, and all the main functions in this device work clearly.

Pros
  • The Bixby button was removed, the triple screen resolution to choose from and the dual use of the second SIM card, also to choose from for a SIM or a memory card. They added a third camera, and the front camera was improved very much, completely reworking and bringing the resolution to 10. Reduced the size and weight in compared with the 9th one, for a more comfortable grip. The electronic pen has also been improved a lot.
Cons
  • The heart rate sensor was thrown out, which made the pre-installed samsung helth application and, in general, more pre-installed software than necessary, both from Samsung and microsoft, and from the government of 2022, and its services, all this is unremovable. Gloom! When pumping through an that in the old version-7.2, at the end of August-beginning of September (I took the device from the officials at the very start of sales at the end of August), the prox. Exinos 98 25 showed -352 thousand during the first test, and 296 thousand . , with the third only 270 thousand parrots, and with the fourth and fifth even less. With knowledge of the matter, I say that not only the current Apple bionics, but even outdated fjons on iPhones have never allowed themselves such a sharp sag in performance. Shame and shame on you, Samsung company! That's how they say, where a horse with a hoof, there is a cancer with a claw! Where are the Koreans to rivet their processors: not for Senka's hat!