Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
A Phichet Seedok ᠌ photo
Bangkok
1 Level
124 Review
201 Karma

Review on Canon 35Mm USM Wide Angle Lens by A Phichet Seedok ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

In short, are you choosing between sigma art and this canoe? Take this canoe. It’s lighter, a little weaker in sharpness, but you don’t take pictures on billboards either. Does not smear in focus from the word almost. It happens to miss once, BUT knowing Sigma, this can not even be considered. I have a sigma 50mm art, I don’t regret buying it, although there are drawbacks. But it's still much better than the original 1.2. You will not really use either 1.2 or 1.4 (infa weave). 2.0 is enough for the eyes. And it's lighter! It is a pity that there are no similar analogues for 50mm. (you can not suggest in the comments, I know what I need)

Pros
  • Stabilizer Aperture sharpness Ease
Cons
  • There are aberrations, but ooooooo very rare, I noticed once at all)

Comments (5)

Please, sign in to write a comment
November 16, 2022
Has some pros Good lens, excellent sharpness, bokeh like 50 mm, I like the stabilizer, the shots are clear, I get confidence from shooting Cons below: On the lens website, the minimum aperture was listed as 1.8, but in fact 2.0, they gave a promotional code for a mistake, I will use it
November 16, 2022
Why didn't I find out about it before buying the Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art? Here are some photos of the glass!
November 16, 2022
Some pros: 1. Price 2. Stub 3. Doesn't smudge like Sigma Art 4. light weight) With its cons. Sometimes af does not keep up with the report. But it's in a dark place.
November 16, 2022
With its pros. picture quality, small size and weight, working 2 With its cons. high price, inadequate hood price
November 16, 2022
With its pros. Compared to the L versions, this one will be much sharper at apertures from f / 4 Stub working. Its cons: For careful use only. Better indoors and without dust)