New Nikon 18-105mm Vibration Reduction 📷 Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLRs Review

I compare the whale Sony 18-55 years on the Sony A100 (combined with a successful copy of the Sigma 70-300 APO) vast range of focal lengths, and I find that "it is as it should be," despite the fact that, subjectively, the quality has increased significantly.

As a first lens, Has pros: Small, light, moderately sharp, the presence of a stabilizer, Assembly Thailand. Some cons: Soaps on an open aperture, chromate, mm - barrel, by 105 especially in low light.

An objective review of this item.Different pros: Decent lens for matrices no more than 14 megapixels Some cons: At such a price, why stick them out, of course they are.

In general, for a novice amateur, the lens will go, I repeat, learn and fill your hand, and as they say, they are met by the carcass or the lens, and they are escorted by the pictures)))) All good shots. Pros below: Perhaps it can be attributed to the lens, on which you can simply fill the experience with technology. Has some cons: A cracked plastic mount often lathers, aperture leaves much to be desired, but what do you want for this price.

I bought it in September, I work with it every day, of course, if you shoot on the machine, then there is a little less light, so the camera runs to the maximum ISO. Pros below: Sharpness is quite acceptable, smart AF, in good lighting does not smear. Has some cons: The hood is small, at the short end of the flash the shadow from the lens enters the frame, with the stub turned on, a light back focus.

I have in stock 18-55; 18-105; 55-300 And sharpness and brightness, contrast, saturation, Even quite decent photos are obtained. (Profi-With expensive lenses are photoshopped) Happy owners of this device.

For the first whale lens it will do and in general the pictures are quite normal, but after 9 months of use I realized that this is garbage.

Got pros: The first advantage is, of course, the price, let's start: quite fast for a telephoto, autofocus works great on my D 7000, comfortable ergonomics, nothing more. Has some cons: the stabilizer probably argues like this: hmm, what can I do for coffee or maybe I should sleep? okay, I'll sleep! the picture is not the most colorful seen better and much!

Pros: Focal lengths, focusing speed and volume, Stabilizer, , sharpness, equipment . Cons: Desire for more for the same money: bayonet, aperture ratio, etc. .

A great option for a whale, the range of focal lengths allows you to decide on your desires, understand the kama, what you need, for many, this (18-105) will last forever.

it's better to go broke on it than on 18-55 shoot, understand "what's what", and then - as you like, if you go further, then you will outgrow it, and if not, it will be an excellent all-rounder "For the home, for the family. "

If you buy the first DSLR for 10-30 thousand, but the whale lens does not suit you, I'm selling this one in perfect condition for a ridiculous 7500

Regarding the marriage - personally, on the 3rd week of use, with a sharp decrease in FR, a breeze blows directly into the eye. ) At 18-55, this effect is not so noticeable.

Its pros: "Universality" of focal lengths, good stabilizer performance With its cons: In the dark, autofocus constantly smears, the lens is dark, it dust well.

An excellent replacement for whale 18-55 in my opinion, off the lens, close it with caps and carry it in a clean case" is 100% this is the best of what Nikon offers in the economy line.

I compare with the whale Sony 18-55 years on the Sony A100 (paired with a successful copy of the Sigma 70-300 APO) large range of focal lengths, is as it should be", although, subjectively, the quality has improved slightly.

Has pros: Sharp, versatile range 18-105, light, stabilization, color reproduction. Has cons: Yes, they are not available when buying with a whale, not counting the plastic mount.

High-quality, fast accurate focusing, I used this lens on various expeditions and am very pleased with the landscape, aerial photography, if you have a tripod, you can take good night shots, now I will take a tele-zoom to shoot wild animals.

I wouldn' Ru/users/nikon23ru/view/560651/? page=0 page=0 page=0 and so on Pros: Characteristics are moderate, Has some cons: It has no super-disadvantages, XA, and, most importantly, the aperture below 4.5 does not go away, shooting ONLY from a tripod at a slow shutter speed - I shot at 1/6-1/10, not shorter.

I took it through an online store, it cost me 9650 it lies for 11000-12500 But I avoided this problem :) But it's a matter of habit :) Has some pros: I liked how it works with an external flash - draws softly and cleanly I don' the video on it writes almost as well as on a 35 mm fix Has some cons: The hood, I think, you will have to look for a natural shadow, or additionally shade the lens with something In automatic modes, But in P, Av, T and M mode, them - all these marketing 9 and…