Review on Renewed AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Desktop Processor - 12 Cores, 24 Threads, Unlocked by Ada Marciniak ᠌

On duty, I dealt with AMD Ryzen processors of all generations, and despite their advantages: long-playing socket, number of cores, loyal pricing policy of the manufacturer, thermal interface, and many others. I always chose intel for myself. Cause? Stable and predictable work in all, without exception, applications, coupled with maximum performance in games. Yes, in certain professional applications they lagged behind due to the smaller number of cores, but not so much as to sacrifice speed in everyday, multimedia tasks. However, AMD did not stand still, and if the first two generations caused me nothing more than bewilderment (the products were frankly raw), then after working with the third Ryzen, I was satisfied with the processors. However, there was no desire to purchase one for myself. But with the release of Zen 3, the situation changed and I bought the 5900x. Impression: Quick. Faster than 9900K@5Ghz with 4400@17 memory, which is what I switched from to 5900x. Moreover, it is faster everywhere, starting with the banal installation of Windows, unpacking archives and installing programs, ending with games and a software package from Adobe, where Intel has always been ahead. There is no need to use monitoring and benchmarks to catch the difference. Visible to the eye! There is no need to talk about 12 cores and what they are capable of, and so it is clear. In games, which I did not expect at all, smoothness was added. And those who are afraid to buy AMD because of the high latency of the memory subsystem have nothing to worry about. I play Quake, Quake Champions and COD: MW 2022 on a 240hz monitor and I can say the responsiveness is great. Feels even faster than on the intel system. FPS sky-high. At medium and low settings, everything rests on the 2080 Super.