Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Siu Siu ᠌ photo
1 Level
97 Review
70 Karma

Review on πŸ‘€ Logitech C920x HD Pro Webcam by Siu Siu ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The quality is so-so, the price does not match the quality.

This camera's declared resolution, promise of speed, and high-quality images make it particularly intriguing for machine vision systems, for example, even though it is not ideal for simple ones. Why is everything dragging its feet? The explanation is straightforward: the camera caches low resolution data and then slowly processes it to provide a steady stream of higher quality. When you're barely moving your lips in front of the camera, that might work, but in any other situation, wild tomosa is obvious. The Skype transmission channel is even slower, and users might not notice that the camera is incredibly sluggish at the resolution for which it was purchased. This is clearly how marketers and engineers calculated. Due to the addition of broadcasting software, the following iteration of this camera was given the name Stream. And one more second. It is preferable to use a separate power source and an active USB hub to connect the camera. Only in this situation is using an extension cord actually feasible. Regular "active extension cord" is insufficient. The development of the defense against its bugs consumed a significant amount of working man-hours, which is generally a complete disappointment.

Pros
  • The best marketing makes you believe you are purchasing a genuine item. The initial low resolution in FullHD can be converted into a nice static image using proper interpolation techniques. Regarding the microphone, there are no grievances.
Cons
  • It is excessively pricey. Everything else simply can't withstand close examination. I will begin with points. There isn't actually any FullHD/30 there; the specification merely mentions it on paper. It is just impossible to achieve 30 frames per second in this mode; the actual FPS is 3-5 frames per second, and there is also a two-to-five second latency! Everything functions as it should at 1280x720, yet the price of such a camera is three times lower. incomplete drivers. Camera settings can be instantly restored to their default positions, and automation frequently makes mistakes. In spite of the strict image processing techniques, the camera is noisy under dim fluorescent lighting, meaning that it won't perform any better in an office than a camera for a thousand. Active extension cords are not ideal for the camera; external power is needed.