Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Avut Bouchen แ Œ photo
1 Level
112 Review
87 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿ”Š Klipsch R-625FA High-Performance Floorstanding Single Home Speaker in Black with Exceptional Detail by Avut Bouchen แ Œ

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

I took it blindly after inexpensive and very aged cine warfs with an eight-inch subwoofer (I thought I would have to leave the subwoofer - I threw it away, I donโ€™t need it), because nothing seems to be suitable for listening to metal in the budget segment, except Klipsch and Polk. Klipsch seemed more solid in terms of reviews and appearance, as a result, it was bought, there are no regrets. Before buying them, I listened to MA bronzes 100 (a monstrous disappointment, 10 sput them for the price) and 200, they gave younger floor speakers, shelf racks and floor racks, shelf racks, everything else, with their own nadom and incl. with, like, more expensive amplifiers in the listening rooms - all these speakers, on at least slightly "heavy" material, stupidly gave out insipid porridge in all ranges at any volume, moreover, nothing gave the effect of being at a concert with a normally set sound, except perhaps a regiment of p200 at least - depicted. The most laughable thing was when, after a quiet and legible popsyatinka that the seller put on, ChoB tried to listen to a setup that was n times more expensive. At the same time, these clips do not give up at all on any classics, jazz, "correct" recordings of popular music. The only thing that makes them give out their indecency is modern mp3 pop from I-music, and that's not all. In general, if you want to listen to metal, including extreme, electronic, well-recorded pop and hip-hop, sometimes you want something more calm or, on the contrary, talk loudly, and there is not much money - take it.

Pros
  • An excellent punch, an avalanche of bass, they play audibly at a low volume from 28 Hz, a more or less uniform frequency response, although at a volume you can already remove the bass below 60 Hz (maybe a feature of the room, itโ€™s good that I didnโ€™t take the 820s) and I want to talk midrange. Physiology) Sensitivity is present in the entire range, and not just in the HF due to the horn, turned off on the amplifier just -10 dB compared to previous speakers. At a low volume, they play collectedly, without dips in the bass. On a 50 W amplifier, I never turned the volume up to 0, not to mention the positive volume zone, it hurts my ears and the room shakes. Heavy, heaviness is good, heaviness is reliable! And for the sound, because they are loud, but not buzzing, and in terms of the risk of being turned over by a cat, children, guests jumping and waving their heads. Good finish for Deshman speakers, except for the open front.
Cons
  • The first impression is poor self-tapping screws for fastening the legs, and you need to twist them yourself. Thrash! I turned the head of the first one with a ratchet screwdriver to a minimum, when it didnโ€™t even go halfway into the stove, and one on the second speaker was already just a screwdriver with a gentle turn. Plasticine, not steel. Find a replacement right away if there are thin self-tapping screws on the farm, do not even try to twist this rubbish. Difficult to place, the combination of horns and FI on the rear wall sets the same task in terms of a normal panorama and avoidance of bass wadding. If you are forced to put one speaker in a corner, or you have a very asymmetrical room, like a bare wall/arch on one side against a curtain on the other, and the speakers are along the wall between them, you might be in for some surprises. It is better to put 50 cm from the walls, but who has so much extra space even in rooms of 50 square meters. m? They look monstrous without nets, but this is already taste.