Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Jnis Labucis ᠌ photo
1 Level
331 Review
0 Karma

Review on Portable battery with wireless charging support COMMO Magnetic Power Bank, 4 600 mAh, graphite by Jnis Labucis ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

How could such a bad product be made?

The first one came with a marriage. Returned, ordered a second poverbank. Came again with a marriage. Bloating on the adjacent side. The idea is great, the execution is excellent. The format of the stand was licked from the Moft snap on cardholder. It also magnetizes to the iPhone 12 and older and perfectly plays the role of a stand in both vertical and horizontal positions. This is a great idea, I myself have been using the mod for two years now. But implemented this idea poorly. In the position of the stand, the magnet is weak, respectively, the folding stand is poorly fixed. This is the first major drawback. The second is the absence of a vertical magnet. MagSafe is a ring of magnets and (conditionally) one vertical magnet closer to the charging connector. In the power bank, uses only the ring (there are explanations in the photo for the review). This leads to the fact that when you take the phone, you slightly shift the bank itself with your little finger. Asymmetry, inconvenience, etc. appear. The third and most important drawback is the mass marriage. Of the two power banks, both are swollen. Quality control sucked this time. As a result. I also have a marriage, the side attached to the phone swelled up. This results in poor heat dissipation and overheating of the phone. And so the device is interesting. I do not recommend. I believe that the second revision, as with the charging units, will be more interesting for . The photo shows the situation with overheating. Once I tried to charge with ~ 35%. Second time with ~72%. In the latter case, I charged by 10% and overheated the phone. There are questions about the security of the bank as a whole.

Pros
  • Idea, MagSafe (though not quite), stand
Cons
  • Bloating on the adjacent side. Weak magnets and their absence