Review on Renewed Samsung Galaxy Note 9 with 128GB in Midnight Black for AT&T Network by Alvin ᠌

The phone is not worth the money, and there are not even the most fundamental capabilities included. This is my first Samsung device, but my fourth Android one. This is something that I was not anticipating from the flagship phone of the company, which is attempting to compete with Apple despite the fact that it does not even reach the level of standard smart phones. I switched from an Asus Zenfone3, whose primary camera had stopped focusing, but it cost 18 thousand, while it only outperforms the Note9 in terms of convenience and functionality. In any case, I did not see any advantages in speed and battery life with the Zenfone3, so I switched to the Note9 (browser with 60 tabs, mail, applications, do not play games). So: 1. Mail does not show the number of IMAP mail folders that are currently available. At the same time, smart is positioned as being suitable for working in an institutional setting. There is a function labeled ALL FOLDERS on the menu, but not every option is included there. And do you use this phone for work? You will need to download and install another another program. 2. We start the dialer, and once inside, it is NOT POSSIBLE for us to select which contacts will be displayed and which will not. This feature is available on EVERY phone, and you can select which contacts to show and which to hide. This feature is absent from the Note9. As a direct consequence of this, I have porridge there from the mail address book that contains 300 different pieces, as well as phones: on SIM cards, in the memory of the phone, and in Google. This is the most fundamentally basic function there is, and it does not even exist? 3. If you need to press a button on one of the curves of the display (for example, crosses frequently appear in that location in order to close advertisements on websites), you will have to be patient because it only works three or four times. It seems that the sensor on the roundings is not functioning very well. 4. If the smart was charging, ALL of my Android devices had a function that displayed the time if the smart was charging. The clock is displayed on a screen that emits a very faint illumination; this makes it easy to see the time in the middle of the night if you wake up. This straightforward action is beyond the capabilities of Samsung's cutting-edge Always-on Display, which is unable to perform it. You have the option of leaving the clock on all the time or setting a timetable for it. In addition, there is no way for me to prevent the battery from being depleted and have the device function just when it is being charged on this smartphone. In this regard, he is able to display a splash screen or cycle through images while the device is charging. Where do we stand with the clock? Something of no consequence? Sure, but these are the fundamentals that HAVE TO BE and HAVE BEEN INCLUDED on Smartphones for the Past 10 Years. Why isn't this in Samsung at the price of 70? After I switched to this phone, I no longer have the same level of CONVENIENCE or FUNCTIONALITY.