Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ada Borkowska ᠌ photo
1 Level
174 Review
0 Karma

Review on Shure Cancelling Headphones Studio Quality Technology Cell Phones & Accessories by Ada Borkowska ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The purchase is a failure, very dissatisfied.

These are my SECOND PAIR of these headphones, and the benefits and drawbacks that were discussed above apply to both sets. After I had finished the first pair of these ears, I listened to almost every pair of headphones with APTX-LL that is currently on the market. As a consequence of this, I decided to go back to the Shurams, as the sound quality of the other pairs of ears is lacking in comparison. Momentum 3 wireless, having a much more pleasurable bass, again sound "crumpled" and faded in comparison to Aonic 50 and FiiO EH3; Beyerdynamic lagoon anc appeared to be the closest in sound, but they literally crumble after a couple of months because the Chinese poured the wrong additive into the plastic. There was no way to participate in the listening of NC. The Pioneer HDJ-X5BT and the Sinha 350/450 both have a noticeably diminished sound quality as a result of a shortage of supplies at retail locations. In point of fact, one may judge these headphones based just on their appearance; they are typical of conservative Americans yet were manufactured in China. After all, this is not a virtuous enterprise, nor is it a reputable company hailing from the United States, and it is dealing with all of these hipster blues. As a result, since the venerable Shure company had already manufactured the headphones, they offered their actual brothers to the Chinese so that they could be converted into a bluetooth device. But the people who live in China are crafty, and because the American partners didn't supervise them closely, they fulfilled the contract with as little effort as possible. As a result, any whistle (bluetooth receiver) that costs ten dollars works better than these headphones that cost three hundred dollars! And that would be okay after the release of Shure, when they came to their senses and gave these Chinese hands a hand, but no, headphone software is updated every HALF YEAR, and version 0.7 is considered the norm in the United States 2 years after the debut of the product. In a nutshell, TLDR: These headphones earn a solid 4.5 to 5 out of 5 stars when used with only one device (no mic) or when corded. If you have more than one gadget, you get a score of 2/5.

Pros
  • Good headphones with a nice sound; strong sound, superb attacks; good design; the transparency mode functions well; relatively quick charging (about an hour); Bluetooth is present; there is an application with a multi-band equalization; firmware for the headphones that can be upgraded; sound reproduction via TYPE-C; support for all conceivable ATPX/APTX-LL/APTX-HD/SBC/AAC/LDAC codecs; The microphone is usable, however it has some crackling.
Cons
  • Horrible bluetooth headphones with a good sound; flat bass; elevated highs that whistle (sibilants); EQ saves with the setting -_; yet, the flatness does not go away at all; average control ergonomics, inadequate headband adjustment (fixation of divisions is very slow), and rattling design; ANC working?; cannot be charged using a full connection connected to a personal computer, possesses no standby mode, and has a capacity of only 16 hours; Bluetooth is a terrible technology that is continually disconnecting, losing either the sound or the connection, and when it does reconnect it stutters and it is nearly difficult to use it with two devices at the same time (also known as multipoint). When you turn on the application, the sound of the headphones may vanish for good; the sound is noticeably improved by LDAC; however, the sound can be trite work in one application, and in another abyss; and it works normally (in the "quality mode") only from a distance of a couple of meters. the application with a multi-band equalizer works the devil knows how. the equalizer works only for AAC / SBC / APTX; it does not work

Similar reviews