Review on 27" Apple iMac All-in-One (Retina 5K, Mid 2017) MNE92RU/A, 5120x2880, Intel Core i5 3.4GHz, 8GB RAM, 1TB HDD, AMD Radeon Pro 570, MacOS, Silver by Adam Rymko ᠌

Name: 27" Apple iMac All-in-One (Retina 5K, Mid 2017) MNE92RU/A, 5120x2880, Intel Core i5 3.4GHz, 8GB RAM, 1TB HDD, AMD Radeon Pro 570, MacOS, Silver
Item: 27" Apple iMac All-in-One (Retina 5K, Mid 2017) MNE92RU/A, 5120x2880, Intel Core i5 3.4GHz, 8GB RAM, 1TB HDD, AMD Radeon Pro 570, MacOS, Silver
Rating: 5

May 25, 2023

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

After using various Macbooks for a number of years, I finally decided to make the jump to an iMac. However, at one point, I was surprised to find that I spend almost all of my time seated at a table, so I do not require a device with particularly high portability and mobility. Before there was this flower, there was Air 2022, and I was extremely startled to see the price disparity between that and the iMac after analyzing the specs of both computers. The Apple iMac is one of the most suitable computers that Apple offers, both in terms of cost and performance. If you want to create your own 5K display, it will cost you more than fifty percent of the price of this device. In addition to it, a mouse and keyboard are included in the package. After making the initial purchase, I went out and bought more RAM. I work in a browser, mail, office apps, and simple graphic rendering, and I have not encountered any performance issues. Because of the size of the screen, you are able to fit the windows of all of the necessary programs onto a single display. This tool is intended to be utilized in some way. In general, I am really happy with the purchase, and I strongly recommend it to anyone who has any reservations!

Pros

fantastic screen; despite its age, the overall design is still really well done; excellent hardware; the possibility of adding more RAM with little effort; - quiet - multiple connectors - just one cable to connect and no wires - mac os

Cons

- maybe FD - the system, of course, works rapidly, but it does occasionally pause for a second when opening heavy applications / files (if they are located on the HDD). However, as a general rule, the system caches the files of the programs that are used the most frequently in the SSD. If purchasing the option that included an SSD did not cost as much more money, I would choose to get it.