Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Celina Presz ᠌ photo
1 Level
66 Review
0 Karma

Review on Samsung Galaxy A72 (SM-A725M/DS) by Celina Presz ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The product is absolutely worthless, don't buy it.

This is the same A50 except that it costs twice as much. It has a pitifully thin body, through which the insides of the device can be inspected; however, this body naturally expands when the battery is charged. But may God bless him, in any event, the smartphone is used in conjunction with a case in which this shortcoming may be disguised; however, where can one hide the fact that the brand new A72 out of the box operates "no faster" than the jam-packed to the gills and brake A50? Not any faster, and I wouldn't even go so far as to call it slower! Freezes of applications, screen brakes, systems, and brakes all at once! And this is after you've adjusted all of the settings and ates? Where do we stand with the quality of the reception? In contrast to the A50, which at the very least maintained a consistent connection with both SIMs, the A72 either does not work with any of the SIMs or works with only one of the two! Where do we stand with Wi-Fi? Why is it even worse on the brand-new A72 than it was on the old A50? At a frequency of 5 GHz, the problem is two times as bad, the connection is unreliable, and the reception signal is half as strong! Things are a little bit better with 2.4GHz, but the connection is lost quite frequently! The previous model of the A50 has none of these issues! Where is the battery? When set to economy mode, the A72 has a lifespan that is inferior to that of the A50 when operating in normal mode; where did its 5000mAh go? In general, a disgraceful failure that was also a waste of money! I would not advocate making a purchase! To upgrade the storage capacity of your older A50, all you needed to do was purchase a memory card with 256 gigabytes of space. I really do feel duped!

Pros
  • Brand. External stereo speakers on a smartphone that produce a satisfying sound.
Cons
  • The A72 has a significant defect! Prepare yourself for a drawn-out tale. When I first purchased my Samsung A50 4/64 smartphone in 2022, I did not have any particular requirements or expectations for it at the time. It was a blind buy, purely based on the budget I had at the time, but the A50 astonished me so much for its price that it far above all of my wildest hopes many times over! However, after using it for a couple of years, I already started to miss its memory, the smartphone started to slow down and glitch, but I didn't want to delete anything from it, and then I really regretted that I didn't buy it with 6/128 memory when I first bought it because the A50 turned out to be a great smartphone! After much pain of decision, however, I decided to purchase an A72 8/256 since I had resigned myself to the reality that it is time for us to move on, and I also took into account the fact that it was my error to skimp on the total amount of memory that was available. I can guarantee you this much: I cannot think of anything that would be a bigger letdown! It's possible that my issue is due to the fact that I compare the A72 and the A50. Perhaps there is a psychological component to my happiness with the A50, from which I did not expect anything like this, but he gave me a lot, set against the backdrop of my total dissatisfaction with the A72, from which I expected a lot for its price, but got NOTHING from him!

Similar reviews