Review on Unveiling the Python Intro 5000 Racquetball Racquet Series: Beginner-Friendly Frame, Unbeatable Value, and Authentic Racquetball Brand by Paul Bijeaux

My collection of rackets is small and certainly not valuable, but I've enjoyed hitting all the green and purple balls - all but this one. You should know that I'm cheap. That said, I've never bought a racket for more than $30. Of course, this also means that I should never expect much from the racquets I normally use, at least not in nuances like agility/power/feel/etc, and to be honest I don't expect it either. Instead, I decided that if I needed more power, I'd swing harder; more precision, I will swing softer. I'm not trying to fight Waselenchuck, so you can keep your 200 gram savings and your frame-breaking racquet with you. Why don't I like Python Intro 5000? Well, I don't usually notice a noticeable difference between entry-level racquets - at least none of them deserve a mention considering the price. Walmart Ektelon (bought about 15 years ago - can't remember exact model) seemed to play just as well as a big 5 head CPS Heat; just like Wilson Stryker. To me, they were all functionally the same racquet, despite differences in frame shape, string length, string pattern, etc. That didn't happen with Python. I found it quite weak, unresponsive over a wide area (small sweet spot) and very poor at dissipating vibrations. I understand the sacrifices that come with a lighter racquet, but the marginal gain achieved here doesn't justify the significant loss in power, vibration control and durability. more responsive over a larger range (bigger sweet spot) and with the same playing weight as Python. The same goes for the Head CPS Heat, except perhaps in terms of string durability - the strings broke after the second game - although I suspect it was my fault - the result of my decision to BREAK the absolute bullshit out of the racquet rail by tearing the side rail off the wall. I won't apologize for that. In any case, it's not that I don't recommend Python (I gave it 3 stars after all), I just personally didn't like it. I'd love to choose one of the other intro options mentioned above, but I wouldn't use Python if given the choice. In summary, I was seduced by a star. 4.7 out of 5 was VERY correct. But in my humble amateur opinion, Python doesn't deserve it. It's not a bad buy (after all, any racquet is better than none), but I think other racquets at the same price might be better for your game. you were mine I really like the clear ball connection and have had a hard time using python to find it. I will be the first to admit that this is most likely operator error, but I must also admit that I have not experienced this problem with any other racquet. - Force Chaos (got it for $8 from my local thrift store, so stick to the thrift rule) and it was a revelation. I highly recommend it.