Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Barczuk ᠌ photo
1 Level
340 Review
0 Karma

Review on Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G 8/256 GB, nano SIM+eSIM, black phantom by Wiktor Barczuk ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is usable, I expected a bit more.

I made the switch to the S20+ after purchasing this smartphone at the beginning of the trade-in sales event. When compared to that one, this one is slightly wider, making it somewhat less convenient to use than the other one. Aside from that, their virtues and jambs are completely indistinguishable from one another. There is hardly any distinction; all that was required of you was to hold on to the S20+ and continue using it. This is me bringing attention to the fact that a year has gone by, but that there is no discernible development, at least not in day-to-day living. Samsung has been "rethinking" its camera lineup for a number of years, but the company has yet to demonstrate any discernible progress. There are occasions when the photos turn out great, but autofocus and exposure are typically problematic. In spite of the fact that there are a lot of options (night mode, Pro, frame optimization, etc.), it is extremely challenging to take a good photo if the subject is moving, even slightly, if the lighting is artificial, or if it is twilight outside (and even more so at night), despite the fact that there are a lot of settings. Yes, it doesn't matter what time of day it is; the camera can blur an image even when the sun is shining brightly. In a nutshell, the photographs are out of focus. while it comes to listening to music, the exterior speakers produce a quality sound, as does the sound coming through wired headphones; but, while using wireless headphones, the quality of the sound is subpar at best. Even though I am aware that exinos is not qualcomm and that there is no support for the aptX codec, the sound quality in a gadget that costs this much ought to be impeccable. Even though I dislike using an iPhone because of how cumbersome it is to work with files and texts, the iPhone's sound quality and camera are significantly superior. When it comes to unlocking the device, I do not find the fingerprint scan to be very useful because it does not always function the first time, which may be a source of significant frustration for the user. It would be more beneficial to have something analogous to face ID, like what is on iPhones, but it's probably best not to talk about unlocking the device using the front camera because it doesn't work at all in the dark. A device that, if nothing else, makes life more enjoyable and convenient in general. You can buy it if you don't mind having a terrible camera and bad sound in your wireless headphones. If you do, then you should go ahead and buy it.

Pros
  • 1. An excellent screen 2. Convenient file system 3. The actual performance 4. an attractive and pleasurable appearance (a question of personal preference). 5. Good video quality 6. Support from the manufacturer for operating systems and security ates 7. USB cable data rate 8. The availability of wireless interfaces as well as their speed
Cons
  • 1. The photographs are of a poor quality (while it may seem strange, the film is shot well). 2. mediocre sound quality via bluetooth 3. An excessively close link to the services provided by Google 4. There is no support for microSD storage on the device's internal 5. Support for external flash drives that can only be formatted in the fat 32 format (which is usually considered to be obsolete). 6. According to the criteria established by a fingerprint, unlocking the screen by using the face is not permitted in most cases. assuming that the hands are clean and they make a precise contact with the sensor.