Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Winiewski ᠌ photo
1 Level
337 Review
0 Karma

Review on 27" Monitor Acer Nitro VG272UVbmiipx (UM.HV2EE.S01), 2560x1440, 170Hz, IPS, black by Wiktor Winiewski ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

No joy in buying the product, it's not good.

All in all, I can't recommend this monitor. If there is no marriage, then it is probably quite good, but a lot of people complained about problems with brightness, so there is still a chance to get a monitor with such a surprise. Fortunately, there were no problems with the return, since the pick-up point is across the road. Going to rent somewhere across half of Hong Kong is not a very promising prospect. Therefore, we can say that I resolved the issue quickly and without nerves ('s loyalty to customers is at the level). 2 stars only because of the good looks.

Pros
  • - Good design - Specifically, on my copy there were no dead pixels and glare
Cons
  • And now it's more interesting 1. Firstly, the monitor was, so to speak, with a factory defect, it had a low brightness of the diodes and it was very dim. My second HP 24fw monitor at 300 cd/m2 was much brighter than this monitor at 350 cd/m2 (400 in HDR mode). Acer has drivers on the site that supposedly fix this problem, but this driver is simply not applicable to this monitor, since there is not a single usb input to ate the firmware through the BIOS. By calling the system menu, you can fix the brightness by increasing the Blacklight, but this setting is reset when you turn on / off the monitor and computer, and is also reset after starting any game. 2. I came across a copy with a slight roll to the right. The upper right corner was a few millimeters lower than the left corner. It caught my eye. 3. Personally, I did not like the color reproduction of this monitor. I bought it mainly for work (for playing games in my free time), and all the time the image gave off a slight yellowness (even dancing with a tambourine in the monitor settings did not help to make a normal picture). The white color was terrible. Even with the correction of brightness (described at the end of the first paragraph), this effect did not disappear.