Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ewa Petra ᠌ photo
1 Level
77 Review
0 Karma

Review on Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED Zoom Lens with Auto Focus - Ideal for Nikon DSLR Cameras by Ewa Petra ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Feel free to buy, for such a price, the quality is simply amazing.

In the years that I've used it, the lens has never let me down, and it is compatible with the Nikon D7100. Before settling on a purchase, I looked into a wide variety of other options; these included replacement lenses from Nikon as well as lenses manufactured by Sigma and Tamron; but, the quality of none of these other options was able to match that of him. When it comes to filming reporting, it is imperative that it be brought to everyone's attention immediately away that this lens can be utilized as a close combat weapon. Before you make the buy, it is essential that you have a crystal clear understanding of how you want to put it to use; failing to do so will result in a costly acquisition that was not warranted in any way. Working moments can be distinguished from other moments by the following characteristics: first of all, there is barrel-shaped distortion at 17mm, and starting from 35mm and up to 55mm - it goes on increasing pincushion, but moderately so (both one and the other can be easily corrected in the RAW converter, if you shoot in RAW); second of all, there is pincushion distortion at 55mm, but it is moderately so. secondly, the sharpness of aperture 2.8 is good to exceptional throughout the entire focal range in the center, but the quality fluctuates at the edges, particularly at 24mm, where the image as a whole does not seem good (this only pertains to the 24mm focal length). The following should be taken into consideration with regard to the drawbacks: a relatively large weight, the absence of a stabilizer (it would be useful when shooting handheld without a flash on a covered aperture), the narrowness of application (in terms of: you can't put it on Full Frame), and the price, which is currently (November 2022.) a heavy 80,000 dollars. The most significant disadvantage, though, is the cost. For CROP, it is an evident overkill, regardless of the quality, therefore it is recommended to seek for a used choice (you can find a nice alternative with a discount of up to half) and study it closely before purchasing it for front/back focus and the other functions. Because of this, we now have access to a fantastic lens that is sold at a price that is marginally exorbitant but would be acceptable if it were compatible with FF. But, given the current state of affairs, the only photographers who should consider utilizing this lens are those who are interested in attaining the best possible outcome while using a Zoom lens on CROPS.

Pros
  • Representation of colors, sharpness (see comments), aperture ratio of 2.8 (with reservations), protection against dust and moisture, quality of construction and materials, and protection against dust and moisture. The gold ring that can be found at the lens's front indicates that it is part of Nikon's professional line of lenses. Additionally, the diameter of the filters is 77mm, which is considered to be "professional" in size.
Cons
  • Expense, weight, the fact that it is only for CROP, the absence of a stabilizer (VR), and the length of time the device has been in use are all important considerations (probably in the near future there will be an ate with the "E" and VR index). Regardless of the aperture, there are at least two reasons why attempting to use the lens to capture a "photo" with it will not result in a satisfactory outcome: 1) the range of focal lengths does not include a "portrait" range; 2) even at the maximum focal length (55mm), the quality and perception of the image (flatness) cannot be compared, even with Nikon's 85mm / 1.8 G (D) lens, which, by the way, costs a third of the amount of the new 17-55mm lens.