Review on Experience High-Quality Streaming with Logitech C922 Pro Stream Webcam: 1080P Camera with 720P 60Fps Recording and Tripod Included. by Akemi Akio ᠌

because of this, the rating was dropped to three. I recently came to the realization that marketers have been *lying to us* about video 720x60 frames being 720. And while it is shorter, the length has been increased to 720. If you take the same picture at 720x30 and 720x60 and compare them, you will notice that there is a very clear and noticeable difference. When viewed in 720x60, everything has a soapy appearance. If you are using third-party programs, then it is very obvious that as soon as you switch to 60 frames without changing the resolution, the video quality significantly degrades and becomes comparable to that of low-cost cameras. This is very noticeable. Given the cost of the camera, I had much higher expectations for its performance. the level of excellence of the standards. It's not the best webcam ever made, but it gets the job done. That it can be mounted on a tripod is a very convenient feature. I liked how it performed when shooting in dim light. It was infuriating that in the settings software (when you use the camera as a webcam), you are unable to select a mirror image (so that your movements repeat on the screen like they would in a mirror) and choose what resolution to transmit video at. As a direct consequence of this, not every program is supported. On a website that in the first line on the request "testing the camera online," only 2 frames per second are displayed, the situation has reached the point of absurdity. 2 karl! despite this, the dimensions of the image are 2304 pixels by 1296 pixels. I am aware that the image processor in the camera does not pull, but why is this permission being granted? Skype comes equipped with a background blur function that does a fantastic job. I really hope that the camera software will include this function in the near future so that it can be utilized in a variety of different programs. When looking into different cameras, I noticed that many of them came with a background replacement function. They eliminated it in the most recent version of the firmware, and they did the right thing by doing so. If you want to see how poorly it worked, you can do a search on YouTube. o has nothing to do with your camera in any way, shape, or form! It would also be misleading to advertise such a feature because any webcam capable of running third-party software would have the ability to do the same thing. I am unable to comment on microphones because I do not make use of the one that is built into my camera. The verdict, as a whole, is that this camera is overpriced for what it offers. In my opinion, this ought to be priced a couple thousand dollars lower.