Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Chia-pin Lin แ Œ photo
Yilan City
1 Level
107 Review
125 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿ“ถ ASUS RT-N56U Wireless Router - Enhanced IEEE 802.11n Connectivity by Chia-pin Lin แ Œ

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

In general, these shortcomings are noticeable only during the initial setup of the router (and then if you are a fairly advanced user). Decide for yourself whether you need the ability to control the router via the Internet. If you need it, then there are certain nuances with it, you may have to get confused with setting it up a little more than just activating the corresponding menu item in the web interface. The main consumer is important for the stability of work, and the quality of Internet distribution. Under the above conditions, I have no problems with this, as, in fairness, it should be noted, there were no Giga 2 until recently. Well, the speed over WiFi, in view of the relevance of the device, of course, has grown. At the time of writing this review, I have been using the router for a couple of days. If I find any nuances, I will add a review.

img 1 attached to ๐Ÿ“ถ ASUS RT-N56U Wireless Router - Enhanced IEEE 802.11n Connectivity review by Chia-pin Lin แ Œ
img 2 attached to ๐Ÿ“ถ ASUS RT-N56U Wireless Router - Enhanced IEEE 802.11n Connectivity review by Chia-pin Lin แ Œ

๏ปฟ

Pros
  • The highlights will be compared with Keenetic Giga 2. The router is operated in a one-room apartment with an area of โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹about 40 square meters. m. is located in its very center, the main consumers (computer, tv box, game console) are connected via LAN, a couple of mobile phones, a tablet, a laptop are connected via WiFi. Usually devices (wireless) are located at a distance of no more than 8 meters in a straight line from the router, through a maximum of one concrete wall. Asus has a larger physical size, a heavier case and a solid feel. I personally liked the design. The quality of communication (WiFi) is strongly affected by the loading of the air of neighbors' routers. In this regard, everything is fine with me, there are only about three or four networks in addition to mine, which is probably why in the whole apartment the speed does not drop below 90 m / bit from the declared 100 from the provider (Beeline) (on a 5 GHz network). By LAN cable, of course there are no problems. Asus' graphical interface is visually prettier, but that's a matter of taste. I didnโ€™t experience any problems with the logic of the location of the menu items, but it works more โ€œviscousโ€ compared to the interface of the seven-year-old Keenetic. I was surprised by one moment: the procedure for registering each consumer device, assigning an ip address to it, was accompanied by an invariable reboot of the router (about two to three minutes). There are no such problems in Keenetic, everything is registered quickly and without reboots. Access to files on a USB 3.1 HDD connected via Samba did not cause any complaints. The access speed is much higher than in Keenetic (but there is usb 2.0). There were no issues with the print server either. The mobile application for ios of the current version at the time of 01/25/21 "Asus router", compared to the similar application my. Keenetic supports the brand of the web interface. The app is prettier but feels more "sluggish" compared to the keenetic app. From the obviously negative, I can note that often through the Asus application it is not possible to connect to the router via the Internet from the outside (for example, via the mobile Internet), there are no such problems with keenetic.
Cons
  • Viscous interface (web and mobile apps), frequent reboots when applying various settings, unstable connection to the router to control it from outside via a mobile app (but how often do you need it).

Comments (6)

Please, sign in to write a comment
November 16, 2022
The term is short for serious conclusions, but so far I am satisfied with the router.
November 16, 2022
In general, I liked it, but there are questions about the automatic determination of 2.4 and 5. Often, 2.4 is always assigned automatically, you have to separate it manually .
November 16, 2022
Got pros: Powerful hardware, a good set of settings for standard firmware, it works quietly over L2TP at 500 megabits. Cons below: AIDefence - probably a good thing, but cuts the speed to 100 megabits. Didn't deal with her.
November 16, 2022
We needed a relatively compact router to fit into a multimedia box from the developer. It fits perfectly in size, but the signal quality has become worse than that of a budget competitor.
November 16, 2022
Got pros: Connection quality is top notch. Its cons: Setting up the print server failed.
November 16, 2022
Its pros: Excellent signal range, good penetration through walls, price Cons below: Needs a little fiddling with the settings.