Review on Samsung Factory Unlocked Warranty Renewed Cell Phones & Accessories and Cell Phones by Liyum ᠌

Primarily, the display. I concur with the consensus of tech bloggers that see screen shim (flickering) as a single issue. Two, a camera. I feel like I've been duped at this point. When I found that the photos from the laptop were no better than the photos from my old iPhone 8+, and that in low light conditions, the iPhone turned out to be even better, especially in detail, I was just taken aback. The camera is very important to me because I am a keen photographer and often take pictures on the phone and edit photos on the phone. In the dark, Samsung simply mashes some information with noise reduction, and out comes soap. The presentation and the reviews of this smartphone (presumably paid) all seem to agree that the photography is fantastic. During the introduction, they boasted that this smartphone's camera had been rated highest by Deixomark. And now I ask: what... iPhone, which is now two years old, takes better pictures than the newly announced flagship laptop? In what way is that conceivable? They boast about how great we are from the stage, provide photos shot with a professional camera, and even cite periodicals like Deixomark, yet here it is. I now believe that Samsung and Deixomark are both liars. Then you can't fool anyone either. Even more so when you consider that the price of the smartphone is $110,000. In what way? Third, the voice of the speaker. There's something off about this place; the volume is already rather loud, so you have to strain to hear your passenger when driving, for example. How so? When playing music, the same speaker is loud, but when acting as a hearing aid while on the phone, even the highest volume setting is insufficient when in a noisy environment—unlike the identical iPhone 8+. It's the same while using the iPhone's speakerphone mode; occasionally your conversation partner has to yell above the iPhone's background noise to be heard.