Review on Nikon 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX NIKKOR Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for DSLR Cameras by Hideo Tsushi ᠌

I’m probably very critical of optics - I shot on a crop with many lenses - but I bought a multi-pixel camera and fell for the advice of marketers that in order to reveal it, I supposedly need 18-140 and I really regretted it . There is no quality at such ends, not in vain experienced users talk about three to five zoom ratios - ideally it's 17-50 (I'm not talking about whale) . Of course, this lens will suit many beginners - until they increase their shots by 30,40,50% . I regret that I didn’t take 16-85 or more expensive than 16-80 - they have sharpness not only in the center but also along the edges of the frame. Personally, I cannot call such a lens good, losing a wide angle. It’s normal for them to shoot from 35 to 80 - further distortion, soap . why do I need it then 18 or 140? - it’s so clean to take a walk on a trip and get medium-quality photos . Although why am I crucifying here - a good lens for my money, but not for me. Portraits on it look great, but you can forget about the quality by enlarging the picture on a computer about landscapes. Well, there is a fix for portraits)) Good luck to everyone. I would take either a tamron or sigma 17-50 aperture (if there is an amendment in the carcass front and back focus) or nikon 16-80 but it is expensive. I specially shot the world and post a photo of 18, 25 mm, so that you understand what soap is around the edges . If you want more quality, see other lenses - this is a pure whale and you should not expect miracles here. On wide it is better to shoot at f11 - flu is rather weak at 8.9. Good luck choosing.