Review on Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 SP XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras (Model A09E) by Aditya ᠌

Name: Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 SP XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras (Model A09E)
Item: Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 SP XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras (Model A09E)
Rating: 5

September 13, 2022

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

Before buying glass, you need to understand whether it suits your needs at all. This is, first of all, an average reportage zoom for a full frame. Not a portrait, not a subject, not some other kind.
And in this context, 28 is narrow. To immerse yourself in events, sometimes you want a little wider. On the other hand, good widths are an expensive pleasure in itself, and this zoom is much cheaper than all analogues.

Did he replace my fixes? Yes, in a way. I left only light fixes with character in bokeh. But the entire line of the same "sterile" Sigma 2.8 is sent by forest, for example.

Pros

Price - no comment Weight, dimensions - corresponds to the concept of the UPC-camera, does not disturb the balance, like kilogram glasses. Decisive point. Security - I'm not talking about rain - I don't believe in it and don't want to check it. But at least dust does not appear on the matrix. Sharpness right from the open - I have 24 MP, full frame, in most of the frame at 2.8 it is completely resolved. Focus speed - nothing outstanding, but I have no problems. The minimum focusing distance is a unique feature, often a very nice one. Integration - support for all functions of the E mount, no errors in BB and focus paired with the A7M2, which has such problems with some glasses. Holds backlight - no miracles, but worthy. Liquid - on the secondary market it almost does not lose value.

Cons

The drop in contrast by 75mm is insignificant, but it is what it is. Bokeh without character - absolutely. After Zatz 24-70 2.8 it's even sad and boring, but these are completely different "weight categories". Glare in the bokeh is typical for a zoom, there are no miracles here. The wide end is narrow - probably the saddest thing. Zoom stepless - shots at 51mm, at 37mm - hello. It doesn't affect much, it's just a little annoying =). The materials seem cheap - he is unlikely to live 10-15 years. And this is a workhorse, for her durability is important.