Review on Renewed Samsung Galaxy S10+ Plus 128GB AT&T Factory Unlocked Cellphone - Black by Yusri Ary ᠌

Name: Renewed Samsung Galaxy S10+ Plus 128GB AT&amp;T Factory Unlocked Cellphone - Black
Item: Renewed Samsung Galaxy S10+ Plus 128GB AT&amp;T Factory Unlocked Cellphone - Black
Rating: 1

March 28, 2023

How could such a bad product be made?

Why did you pay before the initial exams were even completed? Absolutely, because this was the primary selling point for the Galaxy S9, and because exynos was so unpopular with consumers, sales were a disaster. It had been hoped that the Koreans would configure their processor for the new one UI shell, but instead they decided to take it for themselves and ran into problems with the double strength.
3. Loss in value. A month after its first launch, the price of the item has dropped from 78k to 58k and may now be purchased. The fact that you maintain prices for at least six months, at the very least, provides some indication of the product's value. Purchase the following year? That's true, there are no justifications for making a purchase; rather, there are justifications for not making a purchase.
4. Cutout for selfie camera. The functionality of the screen is removed from a great number of applications precisely along the border with this camera. If the phone is divided into two applications, for example, cropping occurs along the border with the camera as well. That is to say, the diagonal is no longer 6.4, but rather somewhere 6.1. If this is the case, it would be more cost effective to purchase the Note 9, which features a huge screen that is not cropped in any way. I used the phone for personal and professional reasons, so consider this a major detriment.
5. No esim. The Android device with the highest price tag that does not support eSIM. Why is it necessary to do this? It would be quite convenient for me to leave one SIM card, the second eSIM card, and a flash disk for 128, all of which would cost 128. But, this is not cool or convenient at all.
6. The fingerprint scanner located below the screen is a complete and utter failure. Sometimes you just can't unlock your phone. And again again, the cost of intelligence is something that torments me. So, what the hell is the point? Is there anything that I could have gotten away with paying a higher price for?
After having the car for two months, I have come to the conclusion that I will never buy another car. In no way shape or form do I suggest this to anyone. You can have thousands for 35 s10 or more, but not any more. I would want to bring to your notice the fact that the identical S9+ hung for 34590 for the activity one week ago. Now that we are in this position, accepting it for that amount of money and even growth is not a terrible idea. They then sell them for that amount of money despite the fact that no one wants them and that they sit in the warehouse for months, causing the money in the stores to become frozen. You might also look into the Galaxy A70 or the Xiaomi Mi9 if you're interested. I wouldn't have guessed that it was a Samsung product because it doesn't look anything like their other products at all, but the Galaxy A range seems to offer a lot of benefits in general. But, the market required even people who were so unmotivated to change in order for them to buy.

Pros

It is unfortunate that we have to begin with the merits, but that is just the way it is. 1. This display is in great shape and very juicy. But as far as I can tell, there is nothing worse now available anywhere for a lower price and with the same level of amoled. 2. the firmware; They performed an excellent job, and it is a delight to put to use. Everything is in its proper location, the animations are not any less seamless than those on the iPhone, and the work itself is organic. To summarize, if you take some kind of A70, the firmware on that device is dozens of times more advanced than the firmware on the identical Xiaomi device. And in general, here I found myself thinking that if you take the galaxy A70 for a promotion, then Xiaomi in general loses a thousand miles. This is something that I just caught myself thinking. On the other hand, Samsung started to compete with the mas brand, which is significant in some way. 3. The manner in which the device rests in the hand The display is identical to that seen on the iPhone, but the overall size and dimensions of the gadget have been drastically reduced. 4. Good design. 5. It also takes good photos; the feature on the camera that creates a fish-eye effect is one of my favorites because it allows you to get closer to your subject while still capturing it in the frame; this opens up a lot of creative possibilities.

Cons

Now we'll go into the meat and potatoes of my critique. In spite of the benefits that I pointed out, I believe that Samsung's attempt to swallow was unsuccessful. This is also the reason. 1. The prices have just come down from the ceiling. The cost of the stuffing that is placed into the s10 is exactly twice as much as it should be. In addition, a month later, the company released a line of galaxy A smartphones, which are essentially no worse than the S10 + (the same screen, the same cameras, the same firmware, the same battery, a slightly weaker processor, though, but it will be enough for the eye, there is an NFC chip), BUT this smartphone can be purchased for less than 20,000 dollars! Consider some shrewd approaches to marketing growth. Even for 25 to take for a sweet soul, isn't that not 78? Yes, even for that. What will not be contained within it? It is true that only backwards charging is pointless, but I do not believe that I have wasted my time. 2. Processor. They send us, in the year 2022, a galaxy on an Exynos CPU. This percentage comes from the sample taken the year before and focuses on the older architecture. The same Snapdragon 855 is around 30% more powerful, yet this does not make Samsung any more money; instead, they demand more money and are pushing their outdated product. Have a look at the tests that have been posted on YouTube; you are so far ahead of the competition that it is not even worth discussing. That is, what are your thoughts about it? Offer smart for 80,000, but install hardware from the previous year, which is less powerful than smart, for only 25,000? This comes off to me as a very big letdown. Take the same iPhone for example; Apple is able to offer competitive pricing, but the company's processors are the most powerful available in mobile devices anywhere in the world. As a result, customers are forced to choose between purchasing an iPhone and switching to Android, which forces them to part with a significant amount of cash. But when the situation flips around: the competition is severe, the market can shift 180 degrees every three months, yet basically they put the hardware from the previous year into their flagship product, and they report a record loss in sales while smiling. What is it like? If you can't produce a processor that can compete with others in the market, then why not just sell what's already available? I am at a loss for words to convey it. If I hadn't been able to pre-order the phone and pay for it in advance, I never would have purchased it for this one reason in the real world.