Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Seo Jun Seog ᠌ photo
1 Level
109 Review
66 Karma

Review on πŸ’» Get Amazing Video Quality with Logitech HD Pro Webcam C920 (Discontinued Edition) by Seo Jun Seog ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Poor quality, not worth the money.

This camera is not suitable, for example, for simple machine vision systems, but it is mainly interesting for them with its declared resolution and the promise of speed and picture quality. Why is everything going so much more slowly? The explanation behind this is straightforward: first, the camera stores data with a low resolution in a buffer, and then it slowly processes that data to produce a smooth stream of images with a greater resolution. It could work if you barely move your lips in front of the camera, but in every other circumstance, the crazy tomosa is obvious. The calculation that engineers and marketers have made is crystal clear: the transmission channel for Skype is much slower, and users may not realize that the camera is incredibly slow at the quality for which it was purchased. As a result of the addition of software for broadcasting, the subsequent iteration of this camera was given the name Stream. Then a further pause here. Connecting the camera by way of an active USB hub that has its own power source is the method that is recommended for use. Only in this circumstance is it even remotely feasible to make use of it with an extension cord. The typical "active extension cord" will not suffice in this situation. In overall, a total letdown, and a significant amount of working man-hours were spent on designing the strategy to combat its flaws.

Pros
  • The most effective form of advertising is to provide the impression that the product that you have purchased is genuine. Using the right interpolation algorithms, it is possible to build a high-quality static image in Full HD from a source image with a lower resolution. The microphone has not been the subject of any complaints.
Cons
  • That comes at an exorbitantly high price. Anything else simply does not hold up under close inspection. I'll begin with some points. It is only written down on a piece of paper, in the specification, and does not actually exist. full HD at 30 frames per second. In this mode, it is simply not possible to achieve 30 frames per second; the actual frame rate is between 3 and 5 frames per second, and there is also a lag of between 2 and 5 seconds. Everything functions correctly at 1280x720, but the price of such a camera is a third of what it would be otherwise. drivers that are not yet done. The settings of the camera can be arbitrarily reverted back to their factory defaults relatively easily, and the automation frequently results in errors. In spite of the rigorous image processing algorithms, the camera produces a great deal of noise when subjected to challenging fluorescent lighting; consequently, in an office setting, it will function no better than a camera designed for a the camera does not work well with active extension cords; therefore, additional power is required.