Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Amphai Nanthaklang ᠌ photo
1 Level
114 Review
68 Karma

Review on Canon 24 70Mm 2 8L Standard Zoom by Amphai Nanthaklang ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The right product for me, the price suited me.

On the 5D Mark III, you can leave the only lens, that is, do not buy other glasses at all, the image quality is simply amazing, but there are fixes, 24 1.4 II and any of the 70-200 2.8 by 70 without any problems leave the beginner behind. At the moment, the best of all native 24-70. I think it would be fair to rank something like this: 1 place EF 24-70 II 2nd place Nikon 24-70 3rd place Sony 24-70G

Pros
  • Good image quality at all focal lengths Sharp since 2.8! Nice natural colors Weight and size reduced The 9-blade aperture blurs the background very softly and beautifully (9 blades are standard for Nikon professional optics, for Canon only super telephoto lenses like 300 2,8L II and 400 2,8L II can boast of such aperture, and oddly enough EF 100 2 .8 IS Macro yes 24-70 4 IS) Fast and accurate AF, faster than 70-200 II and on par with 16-35 II Frame made of durable and pleasant to the touch plastic
Cons
  • Controversial design, it is too early to talk about its reliability, but compared to the first version, the fragility of the design is immediately evident, the original 24-70 has been in various situations (rain, sand, frost) and looked and, importantly, worked like new for 3 years operation, no mote, no dust inside, the front lens is not a single scratch (I don’t like filters), so it was sold without problems for 38,000. Immediately after the purchase, I took it to the service, it needed adjustment Although it is better to cover at 2.8 sharp at least up to 3.2 - due to strong aberrations in the open Rarely, but still can crawl back and forth for a long time (appears in backlight) I didn’t like the lens hood, I left a piece of useless plastic in the box 82 filter for someone it will also be a minus