Canon 24 70Mm 2 8L Standard Zoom Review
32
·
Very good
Rating
4.4
👓 Lenses
Media
(4)
Details
| Brand | Canon |
|---|---|
| Lens Type | Wide Angle |
| Compatible Mountings | Canon EF |
| Camera Lens Description | 70 millimetres |
| Maximum Focal Length | 70 Millimeters |
Description of Canon 24 70Mm 2 8L Standard Zoom
24 70 millimetre focal length, 38.4 112 millimetre equivalent focal length on Canon APS C cameras. F2.8 constant maximum aperture; F22 minimum, ring type ultrasonic type AF motor with full time manual focusing. 82 millimetre filters, closest focusing distance: 0.38 meter/1.25 feet. Image Stabilization : No. Focus adjustment: Inner focusing with USM. Diagonal angle of view: 84° - 34°. Weight 1.7 pound. Purchase this product between May 1, 2016 and July 30, 2016 and get 13 months of free damage protection from Canon. The product must be registered within 30 days of the purchase date to be eligible.
Pros
- Versatility, color rendering, optimal weight, latch-clamp of the trunk, luminosity
Cons
- The sharpness is not very good, the plastic body, some complain about the peeling rubber bands, the trunk sometimes leaves itself under weight, a big price
Pros
- 1) Sharp compared to Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM 2) Focus hits exactly 3) Bokeh is great 4) The design is amazing 5) The ride is very smooth 60 Lighter and smaller than the old version, and even more so the lens hood is smaller
Pros
- This "zoom lens" type of lens achieves a very high level of sharpness. Fixes with an aperture ratio of 1.4 (except for half a lens of 1.8) and more on their focal lengths will be able to do this zoom by 100% (in reality, they will be better by about 30%, but not any more). Fixes with an aperture ratio of 2 or less unquestionably lose to him in everything when compared to him. For the first two months after buying it, the autofocus was accurate on both the crop (600D) and full (5Dm3) settings. However, after that, it began to struggle to focus on challenging targets (a sideways glossy white stripe on a light background). In terms of performance, it is on par with any fixes thanks to the outstanding color rendering. The fact that I began to blur autofocus is a benefit of what was just described; filters are already pretty expensive. I used to use manual focus more regularly when shooting at dusk before there were so many sentiments.
Cons
- The only negative aspect is the price! In actuality, it shouldn't cost more than 70% of the cost of a brand-new 70-200 II 2.8/f lens. And you're right; the hood isn't doing very well. However it appears that the tilt of the entire frame is to blame for this. Even if it's only a feature, this is unquestionably necessary. When used at 70 millimeters, this tube is inferior to the Canon 70-200 II 2.8/f. Filters could be quite expensive. Dusk is not the best time to concentrate, so you must use the handles to complete all tasks. Higher quality fixes are definitely preferred, but you have to carry the whole bucket.
Pros
- An fantastic pick for a stock lens. It is sharp, tenacious, and, because it does not have a stub, it does not irritate, produce noise, or twitch, and the movement is very smooth.
Cons
- I would only point out the price and the weight as being negative aspects of the product; however, it is pointless to complain about the price, and owing to the design of the lens, it is unlikely that the weight will alter in the near future.
Pros
- Continuous luminosity, dust and moisture protection.
Cons
- The absence of a stabilizer, shaky autofocus, missed shots, and the high price.
Pros
- Constant luminosity, dust and moisture protection.
Cons
- Lack of a stabilizer, unstable autofocus, misses, price.
Pros
- Aperture beautiful bokeh high definition Good autofocus performance
Cons
- No stabilizer
Pros
- Great lens. Very high quality picture, almost no misses in focus. The design is beyond praise!
Cons
- First of all, the price. And oddly enough, the lack of a stub. The weight.
Pros
- Good image quality at all focal lengths Sharp since 2.8! Nice natural colors Weight and size reduced The 9-blade aperture blurs the background very softly and beautifully (9 blades are standard for Nikon professional optics, for Canon only super telephoto lenses like 300 2,8L II and 400 2,8L II can boast of such aperture, and oddly enough EF 100 2 .8 IS Macro yes 24-70 4 IS) Fast and accurate AF, faster than 70-200 II and on par with 16-35 II Frame made of durable and pleasant to the touch plastic
Cons
- Controversial design, it is too early to talk about its reliability, but compared to the first version, the fragility of the design is immediately evident, the original 24-70 has been in various situations (rain, sand, frost) and looked and, importantly, worked like new for 3 years operation, no mote, no dust inside, the front lens is not a single scratch (I don’t like filters), so it was sold without problems for 38,000. Immediately after the purchase, I took it to the service, it needed adjustment Although it is better to cover at 2.8 sharp at least up to 3.2 - due to strong aberrations in the open Rarely, but still can crawl back and forth for a long time (appears in backlight) I didn’t like the lens hood, I left a piece of useless plastic in the box 82 filter for someone it will also be a minus
Pros
- From and to
Cons
- the hood is stupid in every way, it is extremely difficult to remove the lid with the hood on
