Review on Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002 by Momchil Ivanov ᠌

The value for money is superb. I didn't have to judge it against the rest of the crop because I bought it the second it became available on FF. Great performance on 5 DII. Since the wide angle no longer functions (since the lens is now larger than 38 mm), I don't see the sense in bringing it to the crop if I continue to use it. Furthermore, I believe that 24-105 is a perfect replacement for 15-85. There aren't enough stars in the sky to make the FF a bad choice for a universal zoom, especially if you don't spend much time worrying about the optics fleet. and it will function perfectly. As a universal glass, that's why I got it. When traveling light or in the office, when finer points of composition are not essential, this is the lens I reach for. 500D features a 15-85. Although I had to sharpen quite a bit, the quality met my expectations. Even so, I anticipate that the 24-105 crop will be sharper than it.Yes, and it gets really sharp at the 5–6 range. I was hoping for better results while using the flash (580 II) indoors, especially when ambient light levels are low. I'll give the 16-35 L II and the 70-300 L a go as comparison lenses because they cover some of his focus lengths. In terms of wide angle, there is really no point in making a comparison to the 16-35 L II. Stronger at 16–35 II is the drawing. Within a range of 70-100 mm, the 70-300 L is clearly superior. And this is an other discussion altogether.