Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Amit Amit แ Œ photo
1 Level
131 Review
56 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿ’ฅ Renewed Samsung Galaxy A10e GSM Unlocked Phone 32GB A102U in Black by Amit Amit แ Œ

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good and quality product, but there are flaws.

I deliberately omit the camera and comparison with analogues. The first is not even of secondary importance to me. There is, somehow removes and okay. With the second, everything is clear: in terms of price / goodies, the A10 still does not reach classmates from China. Will the name stand on one scale? Got pros: Screen first. I'm not spoiled for "high definition" and I liked it. I don't see pixels. The drop, oddly enough, does not irritate. I really liked the shell, subjectively beautiful, customizable. Sufficiently smooth rendering in standard applications. Branded Samsung chips like a built-in system reminder of missed calls or other events. Missed them since the "Star" days. Acceptable autonomy. More or less adequate amount of pre-installed software garbage. The format (19:9 if I'm not mistaken?) turned out to be not bad in handling (in hand, pockets). Thought it would be much worse. Two SIM + memory card at the same time. Sometimes it's necessary. The function of splitting the screen for two applications at once. Its cons: RAM is still back to back, very back to back, very, very back to back. The hue of the screen is clearly "cold" and does not have a constant color temperature setting. Coarse warm filter only. Ay Samsung - screens have always been your thing. Mediocre sound in headphones, like the vast majority of budget Android phones (ah Lumiya, I will remember you). In principle, the volume is enough, but there is almost no margin left. The external speaker is focused primarily on the voice. You can watch the movie, but you definitely shouldnโ€™t expect musical miracles. The volume of the call is tolerable (E398, as an unattainable ideal). Extremely slippery and easily soiled case. Minor friezes and slowdowns in rendering do take place at times. For example, in the "Market". I donโ€™t know what provokes them: whether the general โ€œBalancedโ€ diet, a small amount of RAM, or still the โ€œtalentโ€ of Google programmers. Troubles with multiple duplication of functions - two markets, two main accounts (Google and Samsung), in which you constantly get confused out of habit. Minor claims to individual standard programs. Regardless of the origin of these claims, whether it is a flaw in Android as a system or a specific device in particular.