Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ada Atusia  photo
1 Level
186 Review
0 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿ’ป Renewed Apple iPhone 12 Pro 5G US Version in Silver with 128GB for AT&T by Ada Atusia

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Full compliance with the manufacturers assurances, high quality.

My first iPhone is this one. Before to him, only Android flagships existed (Galaxy Nexus, OnePlus 3, OnePlus 6T). When Apple decided to do away with the under-screen home button, Epol pumped iPhones a lot. You no longer need to run from outlet to outlet like everyone who is familiar with iPhones 5/6/7/8 because Akum has visibly grown in size. A file manager has been added, so you may now download anything from the Internet. (Do you even need it?) Everything is precise and timely. After making the purchase, it took me about a day to leave the settings (as is customary), and after 5 months I never returned there to modify anything, but occasionally I'd check which application was draining the battery. 6 hours of screen time with a single charge, occasionally more and occasionally less (if you play). I wear it without a case and solely with the glass cover ($75). (I carry it in my pocket without other items). I'm happy and give the thumbs up. PS: The feel of 128GB on an Android device and an iPhone differs. This is caused by the HEIC / HEIV format, which drastically reduces the size of all the content downloaded from the phone's camera. For instance, the average photo on a 12MP Android device weighs 8โ€“10Mb, while the same shot on an iPhone only takes up 0.8โ€“2Mb. 300 films and 3,000 images, all of which only take up 40GB? Easily! Very fantastic, in a word.

Pros
  • - stunning, - swift, 2 days of work on a single charge, - the camera's ease of use, - recording videos, - a built-in file manager is available.
Cons
  • - If you shoot 4K60, you cannot swap between cameras. - becomes hotter when playing large-scale games like Pubg or Genshin, - If you use a subpar cell network, the charge expires quite rapidly. - The camera's photo capabilities are average. Its photo quality, which costs $100,000, is a 9 out of 10. However, this shortcoming is more than offset by the camera's user-friendly interface. All of a sudden, yes, usability is crucial as well:)

Similar reviews