Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor wikliski ᠌ photo
1 Level
331 Review
0 Karma

Review on Video card MSI Radeon RX 5700 MECH OC 8GB, Retail by Wiktor wikliski ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

There was a question of choosing a manufacturer, and in the news you probably read about the shoals of the cooling system of two of them MSI MECH OC series and ASUS TOF series. Now the information has been ated and MSI and ASUS seem to have fixed these problems. In the end, it's hard to say which card I got from MSI with a fixed jamb or not, but the price of friends decided everything at a price of 22,999. At this price, the closest alternative to a lower performance card. Let me remind you that the same RTX 2600 SUPER costs around 25,000 - 26,000, how much better it is for you to decide. As a result, an interesting offer was obtained at a price of up to 23,000, firstly, I did not take a more productive XT, which means there should be fewer problems with heating. Well, the second 36-month warranty will help solve the problem with card maintenance.

Updated 1 year ago
Rating has not been changed

Pictures speak louder than words, so I've added some photos to my review.

review_update_image_alt



Pros
  • A powerful graphics card from AMD is the closest alternative to the green RTX 2060 SUPER. Before that, there was a video card from AMD ASUS HD7770 (it heats up decently, but it still works, I decided to upgrade to a more modern then from nVidia PALIT GTX 950. The card is not the most powerful, but in terms of price-quality ratio, it seemed to me an excellent option then. Despite the fact that she pulled games like The Witcher 3 in conjunction with the Core I3 6100 is not bad, but there was some disappointment, there were no wow effects. The card is decent, but no more than that, compared to the old HD 7770. video cards more than 12 000. And then I had a reason to check my GTX in games like WOT began to sag to 10 fps, I was delighted I didn’t even carry it in for repairs 3 years have passed and there was no point in investing in it in my opinion. cards up to 10,000 - 12,000 get outdated pretty quickly. If it makes no sense to watch movies in them, but what to play? New games they no longer pull at an acceptable FPS. The most interesting thing is that with a lot of hate, my stove from AMD, which is 8 years old still works and runs some games on FullHD, and the GTX died after three years. The choice for me was the obvious card from AMD is a good investment. That is, they assume that the RX 5700 will be enough for me for 5-8 years. Of course, here we can talk about the jambs of the card manufacturer, but still. The new series from AMD certainly impresses with its performance. The new technical process architecture RDNA and in general the prospect of long-term support, that is, in 3 years my card will not turn into a pumpkin. Then there was the question of choosing between the RX 5500 XT, RX 5600 XT, RX 5700, RX 5700 XT. In terms of price-quality ratio, the RX 5700 turned out to be the best for me. The RX 5600, in my opinion, is overpriced at a price of 20,000. it loses to the GTX 1660 SUPER. The RX 5500 is a very good option for budget gaming, but it's still a significant cut of the RX 5700, although at the moment at 12,000 it looks very good.
Cons
  • Didn't find it. Might be the price for some.